Politics & Other Mistakes: The right man for the job

  • Mail this page!
  • Delicious
  • 1

Zak Ringelstein is the perfect Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate.

If, that is, you happen to be independent U.S. Sen. Angus King.

To ensure his re-election, King needs a Dem nominee who not only can’t win, but won’t cut into his middle-of-the-road base to any significant extent. Ringelstein – who has no name recognition, no political experience, minimal campaign organization, has lived in Maine for about 20 minutes, has too many letters in his last name and too few in his first – is King’s ideal choice.

In reality, it probably won’t make much difference who the Democrats pick as their 2018 candidate. The party hasn’t won a Senate race since 1988, when George Mitchell began his final term. That was also the year computer experts first discussed the idea of the World Wide Web and Conor McGregor of mixed martial arts fame was born. There might have been dinosaurs, too.

Back to the present. King is the odds-on favorite to win another term. The only official Republican contender is state Sen. Eric Brakey of Auburn, who’ll attempt to make up for his deficiencies – no money, no statewide name recognition, a tendency to come across as slightly nuts – by bringing tremendous energy to the campaign. Brakey doesn’t take amphetamines because they’d only slow him down.

There is another member of the GOP who has discussed a Senate bid. But he’s both less energetic than Brakey and more obviously deranged. I’m referring, of course, to Paul LePage, Maine’s governor and noted Civil War fantasist. While enthralling history fans with creative interpretations of past events – the North had atomic weapons, Lincoln was a communist, George Mitchell fought for the Confederacy – LePage is merely pretending to consider a run. He has no intention of doing so.

That leaves us with King, Brakey and some Democrat willing to take such a thrashing at the polls that his or her name will forever after provide fodder for snarky political columnists, who can never resist the urge to mention that in 2012, Dem nominee Cynthia Dill got only slightly more votes than the number of rounds Conor McGregor lasted against Floyd Mayweather.

Which brings us to Ringelstein. He’s 31 years old, lives in Yarmouth, taught school in Portland, was born in New Hampshire, and has lived in such exotic locales as Uganda, Tanzania and Arizona. He and his wife, who’s from Rangeley, moved to Maine last summer after a brief but tumultuous career in the world of technology.

That World Wide Web that was being formulated back when Democrats still won Senate races is apparently now a thing. Ringelstein took advantage of that to develop a program that connected classrooms around the world for lessons. That got him named to Forbes magazine’s 2015 list of “30 Under 30” young entrepreneurs in education. It also led to Renaissance Learning buying his company and making him vice president of strategic partnerships, a job that lasted less time than McGregor against Mayweather. There was a lawsuit, since settled, and Ringelstein went back to teaching – and plotting his political career.

Which is likely to last only slightly longer than that job at Renaissance.

Ringelstein told me he’s running because he’s noticed our junior senator has a tendency to be sort of wimpy. “Angus King is somebody who likes to have it both ways,” he said. “He’s more likely to make a vanilla argument.”

Ringelstein is also annoyed that much of King’s campaign financing comes from out-of-state political action committees. He’s pledged not to accept money from corporations, PACs or people from away, which won’t be difficult because such entities rarely contribute to longshot candidates.

“It’s going to be grassroots,” he said. “I can win by being authentic, by being principled and walking the talk more than any other candidate does.”

On the issues, Ringelstein backs the standard Democratic platform: pro-choice on abortion, Medicare for all, tax the rich, end discrimination against transgendered people, support public schools over charter schools. But he doesn’t want to be mistaken for one of those ultra-liberal Portland Dems – even though he’s ultra-liberal, from the Portland area and a Democrat.

“I firmly support rural Maine values,” he said. “I really do believe there are two Maines, and we have to deal with the economic depression in rural Maine.”

Seems like the perfect candidate. For a third-place finish.

Winning campaign strategies can be emailed to aldiamon@herniahill.net.

  • dillesquire

    Hey, I got more votes than Eliot Cutler and he ran against Paul LePage

  • Ted Markow

    “Seems like the perfect candidate. For a third-place finish.”

    Ranked Choice Voting would be a solution. Worth a try if we have the guts.

    • EdBeem

      How about open primaries instead. Everyone throws a hat in the ring regardless of party affiliation and the top two vote-getters go head-to-head.

      • Ted Markow

        RCV is less prone to manipulation than open primaries.

        “Opponents of the open primary believe that the open primary leaves the party nominations vulnerable to manipulation and dilution. First, one party could organize its voters to vote in the other party’s primary and choose the candidate that they most agree with or that they think their party could most easily defeat. Secondly, in the open primary moderates and independent voters can vote in either party. This occurrence may dilute the vote of a particular party and lead to a nominee who does not represent the views of his or her particular party.

        “For example, in the 2008 presidential primaries, exit polls say John McCain failed to win a single race among Republican voters, up to Super Tuesday, yet during that same period he went from also-ran to front runner, because most non-Republicans who crossed over voted for him. In New Hampshire, Mitt Romney won among registered Republicans, but John McCain won overall [1]. Likewise, in South Carolina, Mike Huckabee won among self-identified Republicans, but John McCain won the state [2].

        “Similarly, some Republican advocates called for Republicans to cross over and vote in the Democratic race, to help Barack Obama win, on the premise that Clinton had a better chance of beating their candidate. The Rush Limbaugh Show’s “Operation Chaos” is the best known of these movements.”

        RCV is not perfect – there doesn’t appear to be a type of voting that can completely prevent tactical operations – however, RCV (also known as IRV) is one of the least susceptible.

        I think the relevant questions at this point are: 1. Can we afford to keep going with our current plurality system, knowing what is possible?, and 2. Now that RCV has been approved by Maine voters, should we start from scratch by introducing another system into the mix? In my opinion, the answer is “no” to both questions.

        I think there are those out there who would be pleased as punch to sow confusion and keep the status quo going. I’m not one. Let’s TRY something!