Sat, Mar 13, 2010

News Analysis: Brunswick base agency must reconcile region's needs, doubts about Oxford Aviation

BRUNSWICK — Architecturally, there are two-car garages more inspiring than Hangar 6 at Brunswick Naval Air Station.

But in the eyes of the organization overseeing the base's civilian redevelopment, the 166,000-square-foot building's significance supersedes its aesthetic.

Base redevelopers have described Hangar 6 as the crown jewel of the 3,200-acre facility. Its three hangar bays can accommodate passenger airliners. Its workshops, locker rooms and administration areas could be filled with hundreds of workers. 

It's an enticing vision, particularly for the Midcoast Regional Redevelopment Authority, which sits on the front line of the civilian transition, responsible for replacing the 5,000 jobs and $140 million in income estimated to be lost when BNAS is closed.

As soon as Thursday, Oct. 22, the authority's board of trustees could be asked to vote on a lease agreement with Oxford Aviation, a private aircraft refurbishing company that has promised to fulfill MRRA's Hangar 6 vision with a Brunswick Jet Division.

The two parties have been negotiating for a year, often with the Oxford-based firm taking the unusual step of going public with promises of adding 200 jobs thanks to unconsummated deals with industry titans like Airbus. 

But the company's claims contrast with its record. Oxford Aviation made few friends when its deal to create a Sanford Jet Division collapsed last year after about a $1 million investment by Sanford taxpayers.

The story is similar at the company's headquarters at Oxford County Regional Airport, where it has benefited from about $5 million in public grants, loans and tax incentives, yet has been unable to fulfill job creation promises. The company now finds itself embroiled in a legal dispute with its primary benefactor, Oxford County.

Oxford Aviation has also become involved in a disagreement at Eastern Slope Regional Airport in Fryeburg. According to documents obtained through a Freedom of Access request, Oxford Aviation's landlord, the Eastern Slope Airport Authority, is attempting to evict the company after Oxford allegedly failed to fulfill the requirements of its lease.

In a letter dated Sept. 24, attorneys for the airport authority accused Oxford Aviation President Jim Horowitz of doing the "absolute minimum of what is required" in the lease "to avoid termination." 

"(Horowitz) is functioning essentially as an absentee landlord, and he is driving business away from the airport," asserted Peter Mahlia Jr., the attorney for the airport authority.

Horowitz has denied the existence of the Fryeburg dispute. Meanwhile, his attorneys in a Sept. 25 letter, warned the Eastern Slope authority not to publicly discuss the disagreement.

Such events and a series of newspaper reports scrutinizing Oxford Aviation's dealings are the backdrop for the MRRA's vote on the lease agreement.

Several board members have privately expressed skepticism about ratifying the lease, which could include an $800,000 investment by MRRA.

MRRA Executive Director Steve Levesque and John Richardson, state Department of Economic and Community Development commissioner, have acknowledged there are questions about Oxford Aviation. Both continue to advance the project, while promising MRRA will perform due diligence before there is an agreement with the company.

But speculation swirls about Oxford Aviation's ability to get this close to occupying half of Hangar 6.

Much of the theorizing centers on Richardson's political ambitions. The potential gubernatorial candidate could benefit from a ceremonial announcement of new jobs, even if there is no real guarantee that the achievement will last beyond the ribbon-cutting – just as it didn't after Gov. John Baldacci used Oxford Aviation's Sanford Jet Division groundbreaking as a campaign stop just six days before his re-election in 2007.  

Levesque, meanwhile, undoubtedly feels pressure to create jobs and revenue during an economic downturn made worse locally by the impending base shutdown.

Levesque, the former DECD commissioner under Gov. Angus King, has had past dealings with Oxford Aviation and he recently refuted claims that the company was the recipient of corporate welfare. He argued that public-private partnerships – and their inherent receipt of grants and tax incentives – were one of the few ways Maine can compete with other states in economic development.

That assertion is coupled with MRRA's pressing funding needs. Next summer, MRRA hopes to take over airport operations at BNAS, a job Levesque estimates will cost $650,000 annually.

Levesque hopes tenants at the airport – i.e, Oxford Aviation – will help pay those operating costs. He said this week that MRRA's ability to assume control of the airfield from the Federal Aviation Administration will depend on the agency's ability to prove it can pay for it.

"If we have a tenant ready to move in, it makes it easier to pull the trigger (to take over the airport)," Levesque said. 

Levesque said Oxford Aviation isn't the only potential tenant with which MRRA is negotiating, but he declined to identify others.

However, under the circumstances, MRRA's decision about Oxford Aviation may be its most important one, requiring the board to reconcile doubts about the company with the authority's short-term need for tenants.

It may also say more about whether the authority is willing to gamble its long-term vision for BNAS, and half of the base's crown jewel, than it does about Oxford Aviation.

Steve Mistler can be reached at 373-9060 ext. 123 or smistler@theforecaster.net

 

 

Comments

Melvin Udall says:

Anyone who expects an extremely ambitious politician, albeit with "too much baggage," to do the right thing while standing on the stage under the spotlights, with cameras rolling, is naive.

What's the cost to him of doing the wrong thing, especially if it helps him get elected? Once he has the reigns, he can shovel more money down the same slippery chute to make up for "unexpected" and "unfortunate" consequences from giving Oxford the lease.

Perhaps BNAS will become his "takeoff" site for higher national office...say US Senate, perhaps.

(permalink)

wormer says:

I believe the lease will be signed only for political reasons. The original grants to Oxford Aviation was through the support of the democratic delegation and
Baldacci has been touting Oxfords move to BNAS himself. The failure of supporting a local company would be an embarrasment to them. John Richardson himself has had to sign off the previous grant obligations for non performance. His rumored run for gonernor is in this mix also. The failures of Oxford Aviation are quite obvious.
The Sanford lawsuit, poor airport relations at ALL locations and poor job performance. Having Baily in the mix just adds the clown in this circus. The airline and larger aircraft refurbishment industry is very competitive with established domestic and foreign companies. Most airlines refurbish in house or through foreign companies as well as charter
companies with multiple aircraft. They use companies who perform MRO (maintenance,repair,overhaul) and avionics services at the time of refurbishment. Oxford Aviations market has been the small twin and single aircraft market. I believe that is where they will stay and see the facilities at BNAS being under utilized in this capacity. The BNAS hangars should be marketed to some of these larger MRO companies who will provide real employment and oportunity. This effort will take time and patience but the end product will be worth the effort. The public funds sought for a paint booth for Oxford has not reached the proper level of scrutiny for whatever reasons is troubling. There are better use of these funds and the MRRA should be more patient and open in their discussions with potential companies. Portsmouth grew slowly until the facilities were completely open. When this happens at BNAS and an Fixed Base Operation is in place the marketing of these
facilities will be much easier and more attractive. However, for the sake of political expediency I believe the lease with Oxford will be signed and a public display will be made. Time will tell the real story, it usually does.

(permalink)

lobster says:

Brunswick could make an offer to the Navy to acquire the airfield if they wanted, as the original plan was that Brunswick would operate the airfield. Brunswick operated a municipal airport there up until the early 1940's when the Navy took it for an Air Station, so they should be first in line to get the property back. Brunswick is also much more financially able to operate an airport than the MRRA is, which is why the MRRA is so desperate for Oxford Aviation. What's odd about Brunswick is how dysfunctional Town Council is, something Bill Richardson noted as well. Town voters might be much better served with a Board of Selectmen, Town Manager, and town meeting.

(permalink)

You must register or login to post a comment.
Copyright 2010 Sun Media Group