Tue, Feb 09, 2010

Private aviation firm with eyes on Brunswick base thrives on public funds, political connections

OXFORD — On Nov. 1, 2006, Gov. John Baldacci and other political figures converged on Sanford Regional Airport to commemorate what was supposed to have been a significant economic development project and a victory for the governor and his political allies.

The groundbreaking for the $10 million Sanford Jet Division, an expansion of privately owned Oxford Aviation, came just six days before the Nov. 7 election. Baldacci, who was seeking a second term, championed his Pine Tree Zone tax-incentive program and a complex public grant and loan package for helping to pull together a deal backers said would create 200 jobs.

He also credited Jim Horowitz, president of Oxford Aviation, for keeping his aircraft refurbishing business in the state, rather than move to the Pease International Tradeport in Portsmouth, N.H..

"This expansion is important to Oxford Aviation, it's important to the town of Sanford and it's important to the state of Maine," Baldacci said.

Today, a ceremonial shovel used during the groundbreaking hangs on a glory wall at Oxford Aviation's headquarters in the Oxford County Regional Airport.

But there is no Sanford Jet Division. 

The project failed when Oxford's financing collapsed just over a year ago, leaving behind an unfulfilled investment of about $1 million by Sanford taxpayers and a $400,000 loss for Oso LLC of Burlington, Mass., Oxford's would-be financial partner.

Two months later, Oxford announced another expansion project, the Brunswick Jet Division, at Brunswick Naval Air Station.

Once again Oxford Aviation is claiming it will create 200 jobs, and probably more. Again, the private company is seeking public assistance. And once again, that assistance is being stewarded by political figures in Augusta, including Commissioner John Richardson of the Department of Economic and Community Development, a Baldacci appointee and potential gubernatorial candidate.

But the Brunswick project has been dogged by persistent questions about the Sanford experience and about the public funding that has helped Horowitz expand his business three times at the Oxford County Regional Airport – an unremarkable, weed-strewn facility sandwiched between the Oxford Plains Speedway and the adjacent hills.

Compared to the Sanford project, the state's appeal for public support for the Brunswick Jet Division is subdued. Oxford Aviation, on the other hand, has trumpeted the potential benefits of the project through a high-profile surrogate, attorney F. Lee Bailey.

Recently, the charismatic Bailey – who helped defend O.J. Simpson against murder charges – has upstaged redevelopment authority meetings with promises of 200 to 500 jobs and unconsummated deals with industry titans. The project, he and Horowitz say, could make Oxford and Brunswick aviation industry leaders. 

Such promises may entice communities affected by the 2011 base closure, not to mention the Midcoast Regional Redevelopment Authority and state officials tasked with replacing the 5,000 jobs and $140 million in income associated with the U.S. Navy's departure. As the ceremonial sendoff for Patrol and Reconnaissance Wing Five demonstrated on Aug. 27, the reality of those statistics is fast approaching, as is the pressure to meet them with job growth and economic recovery.

But Oxford Aviation's blue-sky predictions, and its reputation for high-quality work, must be reconciled with concerns raised about the company's ability to follow through on job creation promises, its overall public benefit and the failed Sanford deal.

Tenuous deal

Proponents of the Brunswick project are sensitive to questions about Oxford Aviation. MRRA Executive Director Steve Levesque worried last week that "negative press" could kill the deal for Oxford to lease a 166,000-square-foot hangar built in 2005.

MRRA is also contemplating purchasing a paint booth, worth an estimated $800,000, to accommodate Oxford's plans to refurbish airliner-sized aircraft. The town of Brunswick, meanwhile, could be asked to authorize a Community Development Block Grant to help fund the paint booth.

"If we don't do this, we could lose (Oxford) to somewhere else," Levesque said. "We could potentially lose a good opportunity for us and the community. ... They have other options, just like any other business."

Levesque's concerns will undoubtedly weigh on MRRA's directors as they contemplate the lease agreement. But so, too, may comments from Oso Chairman Roberto Tenenbaum, who recently said he terminated his partnership with Oxford Aviation because Horowitz "low-balled" the cost of the Sanford project.

Tenenbaum's comments were relayed by Laura Carroll, his spokeswoman in Burlington.

"During (Tenenbaum's) due diligence he found out that the project would cost $4 million to $5 million more than (Horowitz) said it would," Carroll said, adding that Tenenbaum had already invested close to "half a million dollars" in the project. 

At the end, Carroll said, Tenenbaum felt Horowitz wasn't someone he wanted to do business with.

Oxford County

The Oxford County Regional Airport is a sore topic for Steven Merrill, an Oxford County commissioner since 1994. Merrill has seen about $5 million in county, state and federal money directed to the facility over the last decade.

Most of it, he said, has benefited Oxford Aviation, not Oxford County.

"(Horowitz) runs a world-class business," Merrill said. "But (Oxford Aviation) is basically a publicly funded private enterprise. ... There's quite a lot of sentiment that it's been negative for the county."

Horowitz, meanwhile, maintains that the county has received plenty of benefit.

"If Oxford Aviation owned this facility we probably would've invested more of our own money in it," he said last week. "But it remains a county asset."

Such comments illustrate a relationship that has grown increasingly sour since Oxford Aviation arrived in 1989. Back then, Horowitz, who'd previously operated a boat refurbishing business in Florida, was welcomed by county officials hopeful he could revive the airport.

The early returns were promising.

In 1989, county and state officials helped Horowitz win a nearly $290,000 grant from the federal Economic Development Administration that allowed him to expand a 6,000-square-foot hangar. He reportedly created 20 jobs in return. 

The 1989 expansion set the stage for a more ambitious $935,000 expansion in 1996. That project was made possible by a complex combination of grants that required political support in Augusta.

Levesque, then Gov. Angus King's DECD commissioner, eventually signed off on a deal that funded the hangar expansion and authorized a DECD expenditure of $200,000. In return, Horowitz was to create another 50 jobs by the end of 1999, bringing Oxford Aviation's payroll to about 80 employees. 

According to a December 1999 report in the Lewiston Sun Journal, Horowitz created 12 jobs to bring his payroll to about 45 employees. According to the newspaper, state and federal officials waived the job-creation requirement because Horowitz was having difficulty growing at a small airport, and because the town of Oxford would have been forced to pay back a $326,000 DECD grant.

The size of Oxford's airport became an issue in 1999 when Horowitz sought a runway extension that would allow his business to begin refurbishing larger aircraft. By then, Oxford county commissioners were wary of diverting public funds – in this case about $9 million – to benefit Horowitz. 

"It just wouldn't have been worth it to Oxford County to do anymore," Merrill said, adding that the disappointing strides in general aviation have recently prompted commissioners to reduce funding at the airport. 

Horowitz, who had support from King and DECD, later claimed county commissioners had "sabotaged" his plans with an erroneous feasibility study that overestimated runway expansion costs.

The relationship has deteriorated ever since. Horowitz last year sued the county over a leaky roof and mold issues and he frequently withholds his $1,800-a-month rent. According to the county clerk's office, he hasn't made a monthly lease payment since April.

In February, the county filed a counter-suit against Oxford Aviation claiming breach of contract.

Job creation

Despite Oxford Aviation's job-creation track record, the company has continued to secure public financing.

Horowitz said he employs about 65 in Oxford and at a smaller operation in Fryeburg. Last week, a reporter counted 22 cars in the Oxford parking lot. Inside, about 15 people were working on aircraft. The visit occurred on a Friday, and Horowitz explained that most employees had worked a four-day week, while others were either on vacation or working flexible time. 

When asked about job creation, Horowitz was adamant that Oxford Aviation "met or exceeded each and every one of" its requirements. That statement is supported by officials from the agencies that helped facilitate and promote Oxford's funding sources, including DECD and the Androscoggin Valley Council of Governments.

"From my perspective, (Oxford) has met its requirements," said Bob Thompson, the executive director of AVCOG, a direct participant in the 1996 hangar expansion. "I have the close-out (documents) showing they did."

Thompson ignored a request for copies of those documents. 

MRRA's Levesque said economic conditions may have prevented the company from reaching the 80-employee threshold in 1996.

"Just because they didn't add (50 employees) doesn't mean they should get nailed," he said. "People say what they'd like to do. These aren't contracts. ... If (Oxford) didn't meet the job requirements, (MRRA) wouldn't be able to apply on their behalf now." 

Even if employment hasn't surged, Oxford Aviation's physical plant has grown – to nearly seven times its original size. Hangars are full of aircraft, ranging from a single-engine Cessna, to a multi-million dollar Swedish plane and a Zivko Edge 540 owned by Michael Goulian, one of the top aerobatics pilots in the world.

Horowitz, who wears a ponytail and speaks with a soft voice that belies his pride and ambition, said Oxford Aviation has worked on 4,000 planes since 1989.This fall, he said, would "exceed anything we've done in the history of the company."

Outside the company's facility, a handful of planes were tied down, signifying the county's lone source of airport revenue.

Horowitz consistently credited the pride and craftsmanship of his workers for his success. The claim is echoed in testimonials from three Maine governors, including Baldacci, and former U.S. Sens. George Mitchell and William Cohen. Their words hang on the glory wall, a few feet from the Sanford ceremonial shovel.

As for Sanford, Horowitz said he's sorry that he has waited to address the project's collapse. He said the original estimate he delivered to Oso LLC was driven higher by unforeseen costs, such as site preparation and the rising price of steel. When asked if he'd considered scaling back the size of the project, Horowitz said that's where the deal fell apart.

"We tried to change the concepts of what we wanted to do," he said. "(Oso) had different ideas."

Horowitz acknowledged that some mistakes were made, but it's clear he has moved on. He said he'll spend more than $1 million on the Brunswick Jet Division, a sum he said will well exceed any public investment.

Oso, meanwhile, is still smarting from the Sanford deal. Tenenbaum, through his spokeswoman, said he was breaking his silence because "he didn't want another investor to make the same mistake he did."  

Oso and Horowitz were brought together through political connections. Oso partner Marshall Frankel is the former mayor of Bangor, and a family friend of U.S. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine. According to Oso's spokeswoman, Tenenbaum and Frankel contacted Collins to complain about Horowitz after the deal went south. 

So far, it appears Horowitz has retained his political allies. He said he is proud of his relationship with Maine's power brokers and unapologetic about the money they've helped channel to his business.

"I haven't met anyone in public office, whether it be commissioners, governors or federal agencies," he said, "that hasn't felt good about the projects we've done."

Steve Mistler can be reached at 781-3661 ext. 123 or smistler@theforecaster.net

xmaster says:

Shortly the Maine Heritage Policy Center is going to publish my article on the experience of Loring and its Loring Development Authority. It should provide a lesson for the people of Brunswick and midcoast Maine as to how politicians and government squander our tax dollars when they interfere in the free market. It shows that the Loring Development Authority has spent over $60 million to create less than 300 private sector jobs in 15 years and even those must be continually subsidized.

tuğba özerk gidesim geldi dinle

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

Thanks again to the Forecaster on this topic. The Sun Journal editorial does the right thing...it takes the specifics of Oxford and uses them to call for scrutiny of the statewide situation. Years and years of hostile mismanagement of the business and economic climate in the state have pushed us to a "demographic winter" in which we are simply "managing our demise" rather than planning for a desirable, prosperous, and survivable future. Unless you plan to live in a tree and paddle your kayak to keep warm.

Pine Tree Zones are a nice touch, but they look the problem right in the face and can't see it.

Imagine entrepreneurs crossing the border into Maine, and immediately being thrown into a huge, 100 foot deep lake, teeming with alligators from the anti-capitalist, no-growth, social justice, and takings coalitions.

Pine Tree Zones are the equivalent of draining the lake down to a depth of 90 feet. And then calling a press conference to praise yourself in public for doing so.

They don't change the fundamentals and the hostility and the lust for wealth grabbing and redistribution one bit. They just add a smiley face sticker to the mess.

But we shouldn't be too critical; certain individuals who know their way through the maze can make great sums offering their services as guides, even though this puts an even greater front end load on would be entrepreneurs.

(permalink)

smistler says:

The Sun Journal, which reprinted this story last week, has followed it with an editorial. The link: http://www3.sunjournal.com/node/274357/

Steve Mistler, staff writer

(permalink)

wormer says:

The grandstanding with the gov, MRRA and even with John Richardson was the best joke lately. The new one from Steve Levesque that the negative press may harm this deal tops the last one though. Horowitz is not paying his rent in oxford because of a roof leak? What will he come up with to not pay his hangar lease at BNAS? He has painted over 4000 planes. Must have made money doing that but wants someone else to buy him new equipment. What will happen when the Sanford lawsuit moves forward? Liens on equipment? Is there a copy of a business plan for his new operation? Does it show the viability of maintaing the lease and operational cost of this large hangar and business? If there is any question, he and the MRRA will be asking for more money to support a private business, just as he has done in Oxford. Are there labor records of wages and employee turnover from his Oxford operation to substantiate his claims there? The fifteen cars in the lot was explained away with bs by him. There are a lot of unanswered questions that should be openly discussed before this gets any further consideration. This is public money so the documents should be available to the public. Otherwise this is a backroom political deal. If this inquiry proves to be an embarrasment to those involved,I stand by my "you get what you deserve" statement. I applaud Steve Mistler for looking under rocks. You make mother jones proud.

(permalink)

smistler says:

Thanks for joining the conversation, Wormer. You raise a lot of good questions, some of which I'm still trying to find answers.
As for employment records, I checked various labor agencies, state and federal, but they can't release them because Oxford is a private company and job information is considered proprietary information. There are other sources, but most give job data in ranges that wouldn't be helpful for such a small operation (e.g. I checked one government-sanctioned source that says Oxford employs between 50-100 people.). There are some other clues I can't give away here (the competition is watching), some of which I used for this story, but even that data appears to be inconsistent. Even the jobs in the governor's Nov. 1, 2006, press release, which is linked at the top of this story, conflicts with various news accounts written around the same time. Those totals, by the way, were fed to the press by either Horowitz or the various state agencies backing him.
I'd answer some of your other questions, but again, the competition is watching.
On another note, I think everyone should know that I haven't heard from Horowitz, MRRA or the state since this story was published. I'll leave it to others to theorize about the motives of such a response.

Steve Mistler, staff writer

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

Otherwise?????

Oxford has reportedly signed a "memorandum of understanding" with MRRA. Why don't you see if you can get a copy of it, wormer. I suggest you contact Levesque directly.

And then ask yourself why Richardson made a point of coming to a Brunswick Town Council meeting some weeks ago to insist that "confidentiality is king" in such matters.

Both Levesque and Richardson are fond of "the phone is ringing off the hook" hyperbole, at the same time they insist that those who will bear the fiscal burdens of their deal-making should accept that "protocols" need to be honored to protect the delicate nature of the "negotiations."

If the deals are that fragile, they are virtually guaranteed to be predicated on massive one-sided cash infusions from us.

(permalink)

wormer says:

I agree that confidentiality is needed in contract negotiations with private businesses but not when public funds are being used to support a particular adventure. How about other companies that may ask for public funds? The base redevelopment is crucial economically to the area however it should be done right and openly, not rushed to look good politically at the expense of taxpayers. Given Mr. Horowitz's reputation, my gut feeling is this is the wrong path. I will ask for a copy of the memorandom and be happy to share.

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

Wow....it looks like Oxford's reputation "precedes" its arrival in Brunswick.

Blogger Woodard used the term "fleecing."

That's a cute play on the name F. Lee.....as in Bailey.

I sure as hell wish someone would explain Bailey's inexplicable interest in this caper. That alone doesn't pass the smell test.

As the evidence builds, it looks like we should be "fleeing" from this deal. Or if you prefer, "F. Lee-ing."

(permalink)

lisajw says:

Hear, hear! Noel G should have gone on the Friday hunt with you. What a comparatively tepid story he wrote!! Investigative reporting is nearly as dead as American values. Thanks for keeping its heart beating on the community-level news scene-- perhaps the last bastion for it.

Thanks for counting cars in the parking lot (and adding the bit about it being Friday.) Thanks for giving us a credibility measure for Mr. Thompson. Under the "old" American values system, a man was his word. Loved commissioner Merrill's quote and your description of the "unremarkable, weed-strewn facility." $5 million in Oxford and the look is unremarkable and weed-strewn?! Is that the desired look for BNAS?

It's so impossible to swallow the harsh truth that public funds are floating major banks and "Big 3" car companies that would be belly up otherwise due to their own sustained poor decisions. Thanks to back-room politics (actually lobbying is pretty front-room these days) and new American "values," we're upside down in Wonderland and flirting with vertical on the Titanic.

Public funds propping up the private sector? It's as outrageously wrong in Oxford as it is in Detroit or on Wall Street. Back-room or front-room, politics' all-consuming love affair with the private sector is ruining the American family-- values and all.

Regardless of what high-flying rigs are in Oxford Aviation's hangers for repair, there's a stink of oily deal making oozing from this paper's ink. Thank you, Steve Mistler and Forecaster . Keep the story-line going.

(permalink)

wormer says:

follow the path of Horowitz and his business practices and you will wonder why they would even entertain him. He has always been the best of the bullsh*t artists. The gentleman from New Hampshire should be listened to. Call Sanford Town Office and inquire about the current lawsuit with Oxford Aviation. Steve has taken his bait, hook line and sinker. Horowitz already has a big photoshopped article on his website about Brunswick Jet Division. Painting airplanes is one of the worst enviromental and personal hazard jobs. The paint stripper and painting materials are all hazardous and they do not pay these people very good wages. The personel turnover at his Oxford facility will atest to this. Do your homework Steve and let him go someplace else. Oxford has had enough of him, Fryberg doesn't care for him either. Pease got burned by Pan Am and did their homework this time. How about an enviroment friendly company that does not have their handout and proven performance. I will state that you get what you deserve by getting involved with Horowitz. By the way, when did Baily get out of jail?

(permalink)

pmconusa says:

Shortly the Maine Heritage Policy Center is going to publish my article on the experience of Loring and its Loring Development Authority. It should provide a lesson for the people of Brunswick and midcoast Maine as to how politicians and government squander our tax dollars when they interfere in the free market. It shows that the Loring Development Authority has spent over $60 million to create less than 300 private sector jobs in 15 years and even those must be continually subsidized.

(permalink)

smistler says:

Maine author and journalist Colin Woodard has commented on this story on his blog.
http://colinwoodard.blogspot.com/2009/09/maine-forecaster-investigates-a...
Steve Mistler, staff writer

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

The question of course is whether those other locations are oozing with free money for Mr. Horowitz. We also know that Horowitz and Bailey like to drop such more or less uncertifiable teasers, like "being in contact" with various international airlines, etc.

I understand Oxford had a prior flirtation with Pease, but that fell through as well.

Such velvet covered threats have a way of loosening up taxpayer cash. One wonders whether he's telling the others that Brunswick is making an offer too good to refuse, unless.....etc, etc, etc. In the end, I guess we'll find out who is most desperate with the greatest pot of gold.

It appears that Oxford is incapable of operating a viable business on its own, and has a business model that relies on a steady flow of corporate welfare.

As to Wiki, it failed to watch the entire cinematic story of my life. I turned it around in the second half.

If Bill Ayers can be redeemed, why can't I?

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

Great job of investigative reporting, an art that is sadly lost.

I love this passage:
==========================================

Proponents of the Brunswick project are sensitive to questions about Oxford Aviation. MRRA Executive Director Steve Levesque worried last week that "negative press" could kill the deal for Oxford to lease a 166,000-square-foot hangar built in 2005.

MRRA is also contemplating purchasing a paint booth, worth an estimated $800,000, to accommodate Oxford's plans to refurbish airliner-sized aircraft. The town of Brunswick, meanwhile, could be asked to authorize a Community Development Block Grant to help fund the paint booth.

"If we don't do this, we could lose (Oxford) to somewhere else," Levesque said. "We could potentially lose a good opportunity for us and the community. ... They have other options, just like any other business."

================================================

They have other options Mr. Levesque? OK, name 3. You can't? OK, name 2. You can't? OK, name 1. You can't? Or are you going to claim Sanford is a viable option? If you can't name these other options, why should we believe anything else you say?

Oh...I forgot; there are tons of brand new 166,000 square foot hangars around the country available for free, along with taxpayers ready to buy Oxford a new paint booth as well. Insiders in our government "you just struck it rich" offices know about these, even though we among the unwashed don't.

But don't worry; we can trust Horowitz and his promises....his reputation is built on them.

(permalink)

smistler says:

Thanks for commenting, Melvin (or Jack). I didn't include this in the story because I couldn't confirm it, but Horowitz told me he'd recently been approached by airports in Massachusetts, North Carolina and Florida. He specifically mentioned the Space Coast region near Cocoa Beach because, he said, the area was hurting because of the scheduled decommissioning of the Space Shuttle program. Also, the Pease International Tradeport, which has supposedly courted Horowitz before, just happens to feature a lease opportunity for a 200,000-square-foot hanger on its Web site (http://www.peasedev.org/index/index.asp).
I suspect you'll take all of this with a healthy grain of salt.
By the way, the Wiki description of Melvin Udall leads with, "Melvin Udall is a racist, homophobic, and anti-Semitic misanthrope ..."
Are you okay with that?

Steve Mistler, staff writer

(permalink)

Copyright 2010 Sun Media Group