This November, state ballot Question 1 seeks to increase taxes on individuals and families with adjusted gross income over $128,400 from all sources to fund home-care services for the elderly and disabled regardless of income. While providing home care is a worthy goal, this initiative is bad public policy.
First of all, it targets a specific group of taxpayers to fund one program. Secondly, those requesting services would not be means tested, and the allowed services extend well beyond those traditionally covered. While projections suggest that the tax will raise over $300 million, this fulfills only a token of the need and likely will result in lengthy service wait lists. Finally, there are many unanswered questions, such as the constitutionality of the law, the risk that patient medical data will be compromised, and the clause that caregivers be considered state employees.
Vote no on Question 1.
Jim Elkins
Scarborough
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.