A mailer from opponents of Portland’s Question 2 claims it could allow “just one person to block investments in our city.” That is false.

For developers who play by established zoning rules – including variances and conditional-use projects – nothing would change. But when a developer wants to loosen restrictions, Question 2 would make the process a little less lopsided for local residents, often up against a deep-pocketed developer’s lobbyist, public relations consultant and friends in the right places.

Voters within 500 feet of proposed rezoning could file a protest, and potentially be successful, but not if the applicant secured sufficient support within 1,000 feet of the targeted area. A prudent developer would prevail by engaging the community.

Yes on Question 2 will tell City Hall and developers that when they reshape our community pact known as zoning, Portland residents deserve a fair shot at ensuring that revisions will promote thoughtful growth.

Mark McCain
Portland


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.