Regarding Al Diamon’s recent opinion piece against the National Popular Vote initiative, whereby states would agree to give their electoral votes to the candidate who wins the national popular vote, rather than to the candidate(s) winning their state, thereby bypassing the Electoral College:
It’s time to rethink the Electoral College, and a constitutional amendment (especially a constitutional convention) is a poor way to do so. On the national level it is reasonable that the majority of voters, regardless of where they reside, should elect the president.
Each state gets two senators. If the residents of states are unhappy with the president’s party, they can elect senators from the opposing party. These senators, in turn, can block the president’s agenda as we have seen in the past.
Two senators for each state gives every state a say in legislation. Abandoning the Electoral College gives voice to the will of all voters.
Phil Davies
Falmouth
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.