Advertisement
What People are Reading
Recent
Popular Alltime
Recent Comments
- It's hard to argue for the
5 hours 28 min ago - Sorry, EA. I don't dispute
5 hours 57 min ago - Au contraire, my column keeps
7 hours 44 min ago - Mushroom Media is still
12 hours 46 min ago - The only distinctions I make
2 days 15 hours ago - Romney's wealth is an issue
2 days 15 hours ago - What!? We haven't quite
4 days 13 hours ago - Yes, from a Maryland
5 days 12 hours ago - Well said...and the Only
5 days 13 hours ago - The public needs to
5 days 13 hours ago
Advertisement
Central Maine Power: 'Smart' meter opt-out 'cost prohibitive'
HALLOWELL — For the time being, the public will remain in the dark about the cost details of a possible alternative to Central Maine Power Co.'s "smart" meter program.
Citing confidentiality with its vendors, CMP declined to reveal the cost Monday during a Maine Public Utilities Commission technical conference on CMP's claim that an opt-out provision is not feasible.
The company received a grant in 2009 as part of the federal stimulus act to install Advanced Metering Infrastructure in its customer area, which includes new electric meters and repeaters that transmit usage information over wireless networks.
Once completed, the project will save CMP the cost of manual meter readers and provide immediate outage reports and the ability to turn off electricity to homes and businesses without having to go to the premises.
The project will also make it possible for residential customers to purchase power on an hourly rate, like large customers do, and choose to use appliances when electricity is cheaper.
But five complaints have been filed with the PUC by CMP customers concerned about the safety and cybersecurity of the wireless network and the meters, which emit radio frequency radiation that some say can cause medical problems.
The PUC launched an investigation two weeks ago into CMP's claim that it is not possible to allow customers to opt out because of holes that would create in the grid and the cost of implementing two separate systems.
But those costs have not been made public. The company claims its only feasible option is to place smart meters further from concerned customers' homes.
On Monday, CMP representatives said the cost of purchasing and installing smart meters should remain private.
"The total project costs for the network and IT would be confidential in contract provision with our vendors," CMP attorney Ken Farber said.
However, the company agreed to provide the confidential information to the complainants and those who petitioned to intervene, as long as they all signed confidentiality agreements.
"CMP is hiding key information from its customers, literally blacking out key costs associated with opt-outs," lead PUC complainant Elisa Boxer-Cook of Scarborough said. "We believe the public has a right to know this information, since every customer is affected by this project."
Attorney Alan Stone, who represents Boxer-Cook, said the agreement to release the confidential information to those involved in the case was acceptable for now, but the company has a responsibility to release this information to all customers who are footing the bill.
"Any information that a public utility has – that's why it's called a public utility – should be provided to the general members of the public," Stone said.
CMP did say that its current system of hourly data reporting used by large industrial and some residential customers runs through a phone line, not wirelessly, and costs $750 for each residential customer to purchase and install. This cost and the monthly fee for a dedicated phone line are paid for by the customers.
These meters only send information to CMP, and are not able to receive information, such as shut-off orders. The hard-wired hourly meters are scheduled to be replaced by smart meters.
"Overall, what we've noticed with CMP is that they've never once said, here's how we can do this. They've only tried to show how they can't," Boxer-Cook said.
Bangor Hydro grid
Bangor Hydro, the state's other large electricity distributor, has been using hard-wired meters for its customer data collection since 2005. Rather than wirelessly transmitting data, Bangor Hydro's meters transmit via power lines.
"If the power goes out, we can ping the meters to verify if power is restored," Bangor Hydro spokeswoman Susan Faloon said.
Bangor Hydro Project Manager Kendra Overlock explained that the company installed "callers" on many of its wired meters, which allow them to receive disconnect and reconnect commands.
"We do have two-way communication with the meters," Overlock said.
Faloon said the company has not yet rolled out an hourly rate system, but that customers can view detailed reports of their past usage online. The company plans a pilot plan for hourly pricing for approximately 100 of its 117,000 customers this spring.
Commissioners asked CMP whether offering a similar hard-wired meter to those who wish to opt out of the wireless meters might be a solution.
CMP representatives said running both the wireless and hard-wired systems at the same time would mean doubling the fixed costs, such as software and substation hardware, estimated at more than $53 million for a system that runs through the phone lines.
"Using the Bangor Hydro solution to serve a small number of CMP customers is cost prohibitive," CMP consultant Gary Fauth said.
The breakdown of the $53 million estimate was considered part of the confidential agreement between CMP and its vendors and was not made available to the public.
CMP spokesman John Carroll said a powerline carrier system like Bangor Hydro's would be more expensive than the phone line system.
"The telephone line system is something we can slide in parallel (with the wireless system)," Carroll said. "It's still expensive, but not anywhere near what a powerline carrier would be."
While the technical conference will continue after requests for data from CMP are fulfilled, the smart meters have already been installed on more than 100,000 homes and businesses.
Rep. Heather Sirocki, R-Scarborough, who attended the technical conference Monday, said she has submitted legislation that would require CMP to offer an opt-out solution such as a hardwired meter, at the customer's expense.
"I'm trying to be reasonable," Sirocki said. "CMP would have the ultimate say in what that fee might be."
Similar bills have also been submitted by Reps. Andrea Boland, D-Sanford, and Ben Chipman, U-Portland.
Fire hazards
On Tuesday, another technical conference took place in response to a PUC complaint that claimed installation of the smart meters could cause fires in homes with older wiring.
"Some engineers believe there may be at least a theoretical reason, in some cases, where a wireless smart meter signal could overload electrical wires and cause or contribute to an electrical fire in older homes with outdated wiring or homes that are not grounded," said Richard Taylor, senior research and planning analyst at Maine fire marshal's office in a Jan. 21 letter from complainant Averyl Hill to the PUC.
The Jan. 25 technical conference required CMP to explain the training process for its meter installers. The PUC has not yet decided whether to investigate this complaint.
Emily Parkhurst can be reached at 781-3661 ext. 125 or eparkhurst@theforecaster.net
Comments
The adverse health issues are only disregarded for this case before the PUC. Two more cases are pending approval to open an investigation by PUC. Both of these cases also claim that PUC/CMP has a legal obligation by Maine laws, 35-A Section 101 & 301, to provide "safe" meters. The Maine CDC may have an unofficial opinion, put together in a few weeks of study, but it is not the legal position of the our government and should not be relied on by the PUC.
The CDC is NOT the federally designated authority to determine if RF radiation from meters causes adverse health effects. The federal agency assigned this task is the National Institute of Health, through it's National Toxicology Program, that has been studying this issue for 5 years and is not scheduled to issue a final determination until 2014! In the mean time, these meters cannot be said to be "safe" and since the NIH has determined there was enough evidence of RISK of adverse health effect to undertake this huge study, PUC/CMP should not force all of us to assume this risk if we don't want to. In fact, Hydro Electric customers has smart meters that ARE HARDWIRED, why can't CMP hardwire (to the grid or to phone lines) smart meters instead of taking a RISK with radiofrequency radiation?



As far as cost of allowing people to opt-out, the $54 figure to be born by the opt-outs is the amount over a 20 year period, not yearly! Also, this is NOT the final figure but just an inflated estimate at this point in the hearings. This inflated amount broken down into a monthy figure is guestimated by some of the Complainants to be around $1 to $24 per month. If anyone has an opinion and wants to be heard by the PUC regarding this case, you can write a letter to: Karen Geraghty - Administrative Director, Maine PUC, State House Station #18, 242 State Street, Augusta, ME 04333, RE: Docket Number 2010345, 2010400, 2010346 & 2010389. You can also see the actual Complaints before the PUC and read everyone elses comments by going to the PUC website at www.maine.gov/mpuc/online/index.shtml and
click on "Virtual Case File"
click on "Enter Virtual Case File"
enter 2010345, 0R 2010400 OR 2010398 OR 2010346 in the space provided for "Case ID"
click "Search"
go to the last page of the list, then Scroll down the left column until you see "Initial Filing"
click on the file folder picture in the far left column of this line item and a new window will appear
click on the "pdf symbol" under the top right heading "View" it will take a couple of seconds to come up with a copy of the Complaint
Karen Geraghty, Administrative Director
Maine Public Utilities Commission
18 State House Station 18
Augusta, ME 04333
Re: Case Number 2010-400 & 2010-345 & 2010-389 & 2010-346