Advertisement
What People are Reading
Recent
Popular Alltime
Recent Comments
- It's hard to argue for the
5 hours 26 min ago - Sorry, EA. I don't dispute
5 hours 55 min ago - Au contraire, my column keeps
7 hours 42 min ago - Mushroom Media is still
12 hours 45 min ago - The only distinctions I make
2 days 15 hours ago - Romney's wealth is an issue
2 days 15 hours ago - What!? We haven't quite
4 days 13 hours ago - Yes, from a Maryland
5 days 12 hours ago - Well said...and the Only
5 days 13 hours ago - The public needs to
5 days 13 hours ago
Advertisement
'I thought I was the only one': 3 kids, 3 years, nearly 100 school restraints
SCARBOROUGH — Michael Corbeau vividly remembers being restrained when he was a student in Scarborough.
"The hardest part is when you're going down," Corbeau said. "They count, so you know it's coming. You struggle and fight. That's how people break things, that's when kids and teachers get hurt."
As a child, Corbeau, now 22, was diagnosed with Oppositional Defiance Disorder and Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorder. He was later diagnosed with Asperger's Syndrome and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.
He graduated from Scarborough High School two years ago, but attended several residential and day treatment programs for most of his school years.
But he attended public school in Scarborough on and off, and he's the first to admit he was a difficult kid with serious behavioral issues.
"I was a big kid," Corbeau said. "The staff were intimidated by me."
As a result, he said, staff were rough with him, often leaving him bruised and rug-burned after multiple restraints. Corbeau said this only encouraged him to fight harder.
And he was deeply upset, he said, when he read recently about Brandon Baizley, a young boy subjected to restraints in Scarborough.
"Realizing kids are still growing up that way, it made me mad," he said. "I thought I was the only one."
But Corbeau is not the only child subjected to restraints in the public schools.
In addition to Corbeau and Baizley, two other families from Scarborough have come forward to report restraints and have provided The Forecaster with all the restraint forms they received while their children were attending public schools.
From Dec. 4, 2007, through May 7, 2010, according to those forms, 18 Scarborough school employees performed 95 restraints on three boys between the ages 5 and 8.
Many of the forms contain documentation of several restraints performed the same day, often culminating in the parents being called to pick up their sons. One restraint lasted two hours 35 minutes, with staff switching out when they got tired.
In some cases, the restraints were not documented using the formal restraint forms required by district policy, and only mentioned in passing on a child's daily progress report.
Suspended from kindergarten
Shaune Cook's son, Evan, who was diagnosed with PTSD, developmental delays, stress disorder and Anxiety and Depression Disorder before he began school, was suspended from kindergarten three times for behavioral issues. He was suspended four times in first grade.
"He was in kindergarten," Cook said. "He didn't understand (suspension) was punishment."
Instead, she said, the suspensions and constant calls for her and her husband to retrieve Evan reinforced the idea that if he acted out, he would be rewarded.
"What this says to the child is, 'they send me home because they don't want me.' I don't think (the staff) thinks about that," said Diane Smith of the Disability Rights Center, which represented 37 families last year who made formal complaints about students being repeatedly sent home early or suspended. Nine of those 37 were elementary school children.
Smith said these suspensions, combined with repeated restraints, increase the chances that a student becomes disenfranchised with the system and turns away, dropping out or ending up in the juvenile detention system.
Suspensions and shortened days can be difficult on families, as child care becomes an issue. Smith said repeatedly sending children home emotionally drains the parents and the child.
"Who wants to send their kid where they're not wanted?" she said.
Scarborough School Board Chairman Brian Dell'Olio said if a young child is suspended, the parents should use that as an opportunity to consult with medical personnel to determine if there are larger issues at play.
"Public school is not there to be a convenience, we're there to educate," said Dell'Olio. "I would hope (suspension) would not be a reward, that the student wouldn't just have the week off."
Cook recalled one instance when the principal at Pleasant Hill School called her and told that if she didn't get to the school fast enough, they were going to call police and have her son taken to a hospital psychiatric ward.
"He was sitting right there when she said it," Cook said. "He panicked and was sobbing when I got there. He said 'they're going to take me away from you.'"
Despite his parents making repeated requests that staff not use restraint to bring Evan under control, the situation at Pleasant Hill School, where Evan was in a special classroom, continued to worsen.
Finally, during a meeting in January 2010, staff told Cook that the district would pay to send Evan to School Administrative District 6 in Buxton. He began school there this spring.
"In Buxton, he said to the teachers, 'go ahead and hold me,' then wrapped his hands at his sides expecting to be held. They told him they don't do that there," Cook said.
From February until school ended in June, Evan was not restrained once in Buxton and Cook received only one call from the school when Evan had a particularly bad day.
Cook was so happy with Evan's success that the family sold their home in Scarborough and moved to Buxton.
"A child should not be able to go from one public school to another and have it be this much better," Cook said.
Both Scarborough and Buxton are part of Sebago Alliance, which is a group of school districts looking to consolidate services. Special education services are one of the many things the alliance is looking into as a possibility for consolidation, Dell'Olio said.
When asked if he thought it was unfair to shift the cost burden of these students to other communities, Dell'Olio said it was the Cook family's decision to move to Buxton and that if they had not, Scarborough would have continued to pay for Evan to attend there as long as necessary.
"That was their choice," he said. "They didn't have to move."
Jude Herb's son, Zeke, was in the same special classroom with Evan and Brandon.
In addition to Asperger's Syndrome and ADHD, Zeke also has severe asthma and doctors were worried for a time that he may have cystic fibrosis.
Despite that, Zeke was repeatedly held in two-person prone holds for up to a half-hour while at Pleasant Hill School, according to documents provided by his family.
A May 2009 U.S. Government Accountability Office report found that prone holds have been show to put students, particularly those with breathing issues, at risk of serious injury or death. A July 2009 letter from the Maine Department of Education requested schools prohibit the use of airway-restrictive restraints.
Dell'Olio, who said he had not read The Forecaster's previous two stories on restraints, said he was not sure whether the Scarborough School Board is reviewing the district's restraint policy, and that if a letter from the Maine DOE was sent to the superintendent, it was also sent to the school's lawyer at Drummond Woodsum.
"I think there are times when students can be a danger to themselves and others. These things have to be looked at in a case by case basis," he said.
Herb said she felt like she was on call as soon as she dropped Zeke off for school.
"I've been on a five-minute tether for years," she said.
When the calls started coming every day and the restraint forms became a regular appearance in Zeke's backpack, Herb demanded something be done. As a result, Zeke now attends the Collaborative School in New Gloucester.
"I'm not sure what my kid learned, other than fear, at the Pleasant Hill School," Herb said.
Now, she said, he's doing much better. But she can't help but wonder if Zeke, Evan, Brandon and their other classmates, some of whom have also been sent out of district, were systemically flushed out so their special education program could be dissolved.
The program was eliminated from the budget this year and Scarborough is now spending $159,400 on outside placement for special education students. Private school tuition for public school children is set by the state at $7,440 for elementary school students and $9,154 for secondary school students.
"We are legally obligated to provide (outside placement)," Dell'Olio said.
He explained that an Individual Education Plan is how the school determines what is best for the student, including outside placement.
Alison Marchese, Scarborough's special ed director, and Chris Rohde, Scarborough's assistant special ed director, referred questions to Superintendent David Doyle. Doyle refused to comment and declined to explain why he would not comment.
Assistant Superintendent Jo Ann Sizemore and School Board member Jane Wiseman did not respond to requests for comments. School Board member and Finance Committee Chairman Robert Mitchell is on vacation and could not be reached for comment.
Lifelong impact
For Michael Corbeau, being restrained by Scarborough staff as a child contributed to a lifetime of issues.
As he grew up, his behavior continued to escalate until he accidentally broke a Spurwink staff member's arm when he pushed him out of the way to escape a seclusion room. He was put in a juvenile detention facility for two months pending a trial, then sent to a residential facility in New Hampshire, paid for by the Scarborough School District.
He said the restraints still affect him today, and he is on anti-depressant and anti-psychotic drugs to help deal with PTSD.
Corbeau said his parents agreed to everything the school district recommended, which included "holding" him as part of his individual educational plan, because they trusted the staff.
"Restraints need to be explained better," Corbeau said. "They should use the word restraint. It's not a 'hold,' it's a restraint."
Emily Parkhurst can be reached at 781-3661 ext. 125 or eparkhurst@theforecaster.net
Comments
I have first hand knowledge of how special education students are treated at Scarborough Schools. Unfortunately I have to say that some teachers in Special Ed are just plain stuck between a rock and a hard place but not the way you would think. The people who are replaced the most often are the teachers so it is reasonable to think they have more current training in the newest ideas in special education. Certainly they are more current in day-to-day techniques than administrators who have spent 25+years viewing special education students in the context of school discipline and order, which is a valid viewpoint. However, I have witnessed administrators dictate the minute details of IEPs to case managers, specialists, and teachers in a team decision-making meeting. The input of the new teachers seems to be out of step with the administration's philosophy of special ed and is usually ignored. Sometimes school-hired outside specialists become a thorn in the administration's side because they try to push back against the lack of follow through and the constant progression away from the agreed upon Behavior Plan back to something that escalates the students behavior and obviously would. If the administration wanted to do right by these kids they could. Administrators are there for big policy issues not day to day management of special ed kids or to recommend medical or psychological treatment plans that are way outside their area of expertise. This happens way too often and DHS was actually called twice because we refused to PROVE our child was getting out of school treatment even though we assured administrators our child was going to weekly treatment and we would pass along any and all issues or recommendations we felt were relevant to his/her treatment. Of course DHS quickly determined the complaint to be unfounded TWICE. This shows the attitude of the school administrators to be pretty anti-parent. If the reader is an administrator you should know that I don't expect you to agree or even understand what is being said here. Beyond the obvious lack of eloquence in my comment I am expressing some real issues I have experienced in Scarborough Special Ed. The Middle School Program is the worst. I don't believe in "it's just a really difficult balance to strike" or "you don't understand what we deal with". It's a management problem. Management (administration) needs to find the way to do right by these students who have REAL disabilities. Not just home issues. Either administration believes in the critical role of special ed from the student needs point of view or they don't. Anything else is just managing a threat to law and order in the school and our kids deserve better. There are too many examples of successful special ed programs to just give up and send kids out of district which would be the MOST restrictive placement possible. I think we desperately need new blood at all levels of special ed starting at the top. We have many good people in the trenches now. They just need the support of the bosses and maybe a little more space from their bosses and a couple more classrooms.
OK, folks. Blast away.
Dstoklosa conflicting opinions
I did carefully read, and then reread your comment several times. It is clear that you are not comparing apples to oranges. Your work and past experiences in a NH school district is over shadowing your thoughts and perception of what is going on here in Scarborough.
The third paragraph of your recent comment; regarding students are being exposed to HIV and other disease is extremely reckless and inappropriate. This is nothing more then a scare tactic on your part to excite parents within the community. Then you have the nerve to accuse Ms Parkhurst of sensationalism?
To Scarborough credit, they do a great job of obtaining student’s medical records and notifying parents when a child is injured, or been exposed to medical issues, or aggressive behavior. Please also note that the young children in the article were in a class room of six and not twenty!
It is also clear you have a major problem with non conforming children, or special need children. You have inappropriately label special needs children as problem students in paragraph two of your comment. This comment is in clear violation of the American’s with Disabilities Act! As a teacher, you should know better!
Your assumption that Brandon first private school was a special needs school is wrong. In fact you have successfully just offended a large number of parents who also sent their children to this same school.
Please be advised as a parent: I am not angry, I just want to make sure my child and other children are not exposed to teachers like you. Our children have no need for biases views, reckless opinions and bad attitudes instructors. All children, including the special needs, deserve a positive and hostile free school environment in obtaining their education.
In closing, your comments will most likely create more animosity within the community then these three articles.
If Ocean Winds had read my comment carefully he would have understood that I was referring to the fact that the responsibility for educating a child is not only for the tax payer. The parents have some responsibility too! Too often districts recommend placements, like private day schools referred to in the article, but parents resist, insisting on keeping their child in a regular class in a public school. We all want our money to be well spent to get the most appropriate education for ALL students.
The reason many troubled students do better in a private school is because they are set up specially to deal with outbursts, thus minimally affecting the other students. They may have special padded rooms or other cool down areas away from the classroom. Often, public schools do not have the space or resources.
So what about the other 20+ children impacted by an out-of-control child in a classroom? Do they and the staff deserve the risk of being hit, kicked, bitten, pinched, scratched, and punched on a daily basis? How many parents know that if their child is bitten or otherwise exposed to the bodily fluids of an acting-out child they have no access to information on whether that child is HIV positive or has any other transmittable disease?
I can understand your angry response to what you perceived as an attack on you, as a parent of a special needs child. I also understand that parenting a special needs child is challenging. I see many parents do an outstanding job on a daily basis. I also see many who don't and only want to blame the system for their problems.
My main concern was that fact that the journalist seemed more interested in sensationalism than in comprehensive, accurate reporting of a subject that is a concern for all: children, staff, and parents. We all want the best for children but we need to work together to achieve those ends. This article sought to create animosity in the community.
We must always be vigilant with our methods and practices in education, continuously looking for ways to improve. I believe most schools and unions embrace this belief as well. My district recently trained many of its staff in Crisis Intervention Prevention, a program which promotes restraint as a last resort and modifies restraints of past years to prevent injury.
The problem I have with this article is that it is so lopsided in its reporting that it feels as if the parents wrote it themselves. There is no consideration for, or reporting of, the injuries caused to other children, staff and property. There is no consideration for the continuous interruption in the education of an entire class of students from a child's behavior. The child's "great improvement" in another school is reported by parents without any confirmation of its truth.
Secondly, as a tax payer, I take issue with the fact that a child with behavior problems becomes the responsibility of the schools and the taxpayer, to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars, with very little accountability for the parents. What did they do for 5 years to help this child learn proper behavior? What are they doing when their child is suspended to teach their child that this is not acceptable? Have they followed the recommendations of evaluators and specialists for helping their child at home and at school? Often times children react negatively to the structure and demands of school because they have never had any at home. On the other hand, I have educated many children of varying handicaps who are not violently out of control in school.
Finally, we need to remember that one day these children will grow up and enter the adult court system. If they assault someone as an adult they will be dealing with the consequences of their behavior. This may come as quite a shock if they have never had to accept responsibility for their behavior while growing up. Parents have as much responsibility for ensuring their child becomes a productive and law abiding citizen as do the schools and tax payers.
I agree we must be vigilant at all times, especially when it comes to the selection of the right personal to work with our children. A person education, training, experience, and attitude are all important factors to take in consideration.
After reading the comment posted by dstoklosa it becomes very apparent this is an educator and a tax payer who is more concern about her tax dollars cost, then the well being of our children in general. It is clear from her comments; she has a real issue with money being spent on special needs and disable children. I question if this person should even be teaching with such resentment towards children and their parents.
Her comments are in direct contrast to emails received from other teachers who have been very supportive and sympatric to the children found within the article. Many of these teachers have stated “this should not be happening to these children”. They also agree that children often use their behavior as a way to communicate and to let every body know there is a problem.
As Brandon’s father, allow me to share Brandon’s education history; he attended a private certified educational school before entering public kindergarten. This private school had a well trained, professional, and passionate experience staff; that met, or exceeded certification requirements. Brandon had few issues at this private school and exhibits occasional minor behavioral issues during his two years attendance in this private school.
As an educator, please explain why Brandon’s behavior was positive in a private school, yet negative in a public school. How do you explain the following; after attending a public school for six weeks, Brandon becomes so over whelm with stress and anxiety from being repeatedly drag down the hall way by his teachers? This never happen in Brandon’s other school, so explain to us as parents, why it was alright for teachers in a public school to engage in such abusive activities?
Children respond to their educational environment; if this environment is positive, the child’s behavior will be positive like that of Brandon’s in his private school before kindergarten.
If the educational environment is negative, a child’s behavior then will be negative as seen from Brandon’s public school experience. Upon investigation, much of the staff working with Brandon were not properly certified or trained.
Now that Brandon is back in a private school with positive attitude and outlook of the educators. Brandon is once again starting to exhibiting positive behavior. How does educator such as you, a professional, explain such changes in behavior of a child?
As for proof they are doing better in the new schools; the substantial decreases, or elimination of restraints as reported. That and the return of smiles on their faces upon coming home from school is all the proof this father and mother need.
This is our realization, Scarborough lacks competent leaders that are willing to listen and protect all children in our schools.
As an example, the comments made by the chairman of the school board Brian Dell’Olio in the above article“he was not sure whether the Scarborough School Board is reviewing the district's restraint policy,”. The chairperson of our school board should always have first hand knowledge regarding any policy requests; especially if it comes from the Maine Department of Education prohibiting prone restraints and requesting review our district's restraints policy. Having the chairperson admitting to their lack of knowledge regarding the Department of Education requests, leaves the reader questioning both leadership and communication skills.
Another example of questionable leadership; making very inappropriate medical suggestions with out a medical degree, and then suggesting that student suspensions are directly medical related, “if a young child is suspended, the parents should use that as an opportunity to consult with medical personnel to determine if there are larger issues at play.” Dell’Olio.
Even when parents and medical professionals obtain the proper diagnoses, “the larger issue at play”; the superintendent’s office and school board has failed to recognized, act upon, or follow the medical recommendations. As we can see from Brandon Baizley parent’s actions explained below.
By late September 2008, Brandon Baizley had been medically examined, and the parents had received the following medical recommendations: request a “Functional Behavioral Assessment” of Brandon to be conducted by Blue Point School, and have Brandon examined by a specialist to confirm the probable diagnoses of stress and anxiety as related to his attendance at Blue Point school. The parents made Brandon’s Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) request on October 6, 2008 with Blue Point School, and an appointment was set for December 2008 with Intergraded Behavioral Health in Scarborough. In the interim, Brandon’s parents called for a meeting with Principle Susan Helms, and Superintendent David Doyle seeking an explanation as why no action had taken place or appointment had been set regarding the October 6th FBA request. On November 10th, during the meeting at the superintendent’s office, David Doyle said, ”we do not believe that Brandon stress is related to his attendance at Blue Point, we feel his stress is most likely from his home life”.
During a public School Board meeting, Robert Baizley put Scarborough School Board members on notice of injuries that Brandon had obtained from two improper restraints conducted by staff on December 19th 2008. Chairperson Dell’Olio interrupted Mr. Baizley and said “we do not discuss children’s injuries during public meetings” and would not allow Mr. Baizley to finish addressing the school board. Mr. Dell’Olio also said “some one from this board will contact you within the week, regarding this issue” that commitment to make contact with Mr. Baizley within the week was never realized!
There was no Functional Behavioral Assessment report until January 2010, and the school district has refused to acknowledge the January 2009 medical confirmation of the stress and anxiety resulting from Brandon's mistreatment at school.
Our Scarborough School Board has repeatedly refused to address the issue of improperly conducting restraints, especially by untrained and uncertified staff, that have cause bodily harm and psychological damage to our children. As we can see from the above article, this has gone on far too long, and needs immediate attention now!
The tone of this article makes it sound as if the teachers are cold-hearted brutes, when the reality is this: violence must be stopped. It makes no difference if the angry person is depressed, has ADHD, or any other behavioral diagnosis. The out-of-control behavior must be brought under control before property is destroyed or an injury is inflicted. What alternative do teachers have here?
I worked in social services for years and had two of my front teeth destroyed by being punched by a behavior-problem client. This same "client" trashed a living-room by picking up a television and hurling it repeatedly across the room. On another occasion, he opened cans of paint and splashed the paint everywhere throughout his apartment. This client and two others went into rages a half dozen times a year and would wreak havoc ( bites, punches, kicks, thrown furniture and lamps) wherever they happened to be at the time.
We were trained to safeguard these clients with Mandt holds, an effective and safe restraint when performed correctly. Unfortunately, a lot of damage can be done before a restraint can be applied. Should teachers wait until AFTER property is destroyed or someone is hurt to perform a stop?
I sympathize with those with a challenging behavior problem, but the students and teachers around these people and their blow-ups are also victims, and their rights must be considered equally. The slant of this article neglects to cover that, unfortunately.


Не знаю, как это объяснить и поймешь ли ты меня… Встреча с Дорианом словно дала мне ключ к чему-то совсем новому в живописи, открыла мне новую манеру письма Теперь я вижу вещи в ином свете и все воспринимаю по-иному