Advertisement
What People are Reading
Recent
Popular Alltime
Recent Comments
- If SoPo wants to help
19 hours 36 min ago - Jump to our Web site to find
22 hours 42 min ago - Mark Verrill is clearly not
1 day 16 hours ago - Russ, clearly you are
1 day 16 hours ago - Not to be confused with The
1 day 17 hours ago - It is really nice that there
2 days 12 min ago - I am a member of that
54 min 24 sec ago - "the order also gives
2 days 11 hours ago - What kind of grocery store
2 days 12 hours ago - "Selectman Ronald Riendeau
2 days 18 hours ago
Advertisement
Letter: 'Enlightened' by Beem
On behalf of the unwashed and extremist cretins in the readership of The Forecaster, I’d like to thank you for regularly providing us with the sanctimonious pronouncements of Edgar Allen Beem, complete with a photo to remind us of what a thoughtful and benevolent noble he is as he gazes upon the unworthy. It’s apparent that regularly seeing his photo atop the Opinion Page has helped Beem keep his humility in check; there’s no room for that when you’re out to correct the boorish behavior of the little people.
We are especially grateful for Beem’s recent reminders that expecting laws to be enforced is the last refuge of unreasonable and insensitive xenophobes. And for clarifying that the word "amendment" as it relates to our Constitution is a childish concept clung to by the jingoistic and otherwise unenlightened.
It’s clear that Beem’s view of the “world around him” is having an effect. Just a few weeks ago, he wrote that his mainstream denomination church had something like 180-plus members vote on same-sex issues 10 years ago, but that recently, the 90 or so members voting on the same subject had finally come to their senses and joined the Beem-ians. With numbers like that, how can his influence (and theirs) be denied?
Pem Schaeffer
Brunswick
Comments
Very Orwellian of you, my friend. The truth is all lies, is that it? And who said anything about guns? Of course, you're entitled to own a gun -- unless you're a convicted felon or a certifiable nut job. I'll take your word for it that you're not. You can carry a concealed weapon if you have a permit to do so. And you can carry it openly at all times unless you're wise enough not to do so.
So distinct from legal rights, you suggest wisdom as a consideration in exercising those rights.
Gee....what a concept. Where have I come across that recently?
And in case you missed it, nobody said anything about guns until I did. I simply brought it up to illustrate a parallel to your suggestion that muslim rights were being denied.
You swallowed the bait even deeper than I thought you might. Perhaps analogies fall outside your grasp. How very Beemian.
By the way, I can't seem to find the 2nd Amendment language that says 'certifiable nut job' is a disqualifier. Or is it in the penumbra surrounding all guarantees in the Constitution, including the first? Wouldn't that be something!

Who's denying them freedom? I'm not aware of anyone claiming they cannot build it there.
Many are suggesting that they reconsider their decision, however.
Where do you stand on the 2nd amendment? Would you deny me my freedom to possess firearms? Would you think kindly upon me wearing them everywhere I go? Or concealing them when I do so?
What? You said what?
Your column exemplifies fear and bigotry, in case you haven't realized it yet.