Wed, May 16, 2012

Advertisement

Advertisement

Forecaster Forum: 'It is time for serious adults in Congress'

Our country faces a great decision. We can continue the wild, deficit spending until the wheels come off the economy and we plunge into fiscal chaos, or we can take the necessary steps to rein in spending and save our country from financial disaster.

Voters hold that decision in their hands. They can return to Congress the same people who have driven us towards national insolvency, or they can replace them with a new generation of Republicans sworn to fiscal responsibility.

We’ll know the answer on Nov. 2, but we have already seen evidence that primary election voters understand the gravity of our national debt crisis. They have booted out the jaded old-guard politicians in race after race, nominating fresh faces who are running not for personal glory, but to hand down to their children a country that is not hopelessly in debt. Regardless of all the other issues in this election, the debt is crisis central. If we don’t solve this intelligently, nothing else will matter.

As a candidate for Congress in Maine’s 1st District, I have spent months on the road presenting a detailed breakdown of our $13 trillion national debt and the impact of budget projections that forecast trillion-dollar deficits as far as the eye can see. An educated electorate is our best hope to reach a consensus about what needs to be done. In speaking to groups all over the district, I have watched the lights go on in the eyes of ordinary folks once they hear the facts.

My opponent, Rep. Chellie Pingree, is a career “progressive” who follows the lead of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. She votes the Pelosi line so faithfully that Maine voters could save a lot of money by just sending a rubber stamp to Washington.

These are the people who squandered more than $800 billion on a stimulus plan that did little more than keep unionized state government workers employed for another year or two. They promised that the biggest spending bill in American history would keep unemployment under 8 percent. But we have seen it shoot up to just below 10 percent. For the more than 50,000 Mainers who are out of work, this experiment in Keynesian economics must seem like a cruel joke. The spending package contained $71,000 to study the effects of cocaine addiction on monkeys and $390,000 to study the effects of malt liquor and marijuana on adults.

They followed that up with "Obamacare," embodied in a 2,500-page bill that few Democrats even read. If they did read it, they didn’t understand it. They didn’t say a word about the massive cuts coming to Medicare. They didn’t tell us that the cost of the program during its first full 10 years (2014-2023) is now projected at a budget-crushing $2.4 trillion. In a word, they lied to get this disastrous program enacted.

There were much more reasonable and affordable fixes to our health insurance situation. But Pingree and her cohorts insisted on a program so costly and complicated that a strong majority of Americans now wants the whole thing repealed. In the process, the Democrats did nothing to control the cost of health care, the one thing that everyone wanted.

Meanwhile, the country drifts toward a Greek-style financial catastrophe. The publicly held debt as a share of Gross Domestic Product will exceed 60 percent this year. More than 40 cents of every dollar Washington spends is borrowed money. Your kids and mine will have to pay it back. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, debt will reach 90 percent of GDP by 2020. The interest on this debt alone will reach $916 billion annually – one in every five tax dollars will go for interest payments. By 2022, interest outlays will exceed defense spending. And by 2037 – when the Social Security trust funds will be exhausted – interest payments will be double the Pentagon’s budget.

In July, the CBO warned that the country faces major problems unless the wild spending is brought under control. The fast-growing debt, they said, combined with an unfavorable long-term budget outlook, “would increase the probability of a fiscal crisis for the United States. In such a crisis,” the report adds, “investors become unwilling to finance all of government’s borrowing needs unless they are compensated with very high interest rates.”

Exploding interest rates would ripple through our entire society, of course, with devastating economic effects. Such a poor fiscal situation, the CBO said, can spiral out of control, because the government would need to borrow more money, even at prohibitive interest rates, to continue functioning.

That is the future if the likes of Nancy Pelosi and Chellie Pingree are allowed to continue their absurd spending binge. It is time for them to go and leave the heavy lifting to people who understand the stakes. It is time for serious adults in Congress who know that our nation’s survival and our children’s future are on the line.

Dean Scontras of Eliot is the Republican candidate in Maine’s 1st Congressional District.

Comments

Neal says:

The headline for Dean Scontras' editorial in the Oct. 8th edition was an interesting choice of words, "It is time for serious adults in Congress". I seem to recall this as a theme from speeches made by President Obama on several occasions before and after his election. The President, as I understood him to mean, had been implying that it was time for both political parties to stop childish partisan bickering and get to work on the people's business.
Mr. Scontras attempts to make an argument that the Democrats are solely to blame for the huge deficits/debt plaguing the country. He lays the blame for the health care crisis, housing crisis, credit crisis and unemployment crisis at the feet of the Democrats. A check on the facts may assist Mr. Scontras to recall that these problems began when the government was under the administration of Republicans. Bank bailouts, Wall Street bailouts, and insurance industry bailouts were all instituted by the previous Republican administration and Congress. The ensuing bailouts and borrowing by President Obama's administration done upon his taking office were continuations of Bush policy initiatives. And these initiatives did save jobs.
The crisis in housing, credit and banking were due to lack of regulations and wild financial speculations in those industries. It seems the only people that benefited from 8 years of the republicans running our country were rich people.
The reason the health care reforms are so weak is due to blackmail by republicans on behalf of their financial benefactors in the insurance industry. As I understand the reforms, the majority of the plan was based on ideas from the republican party. Real reform and cost control in health care will not happen until our political leaders become genuinely concerned with the health of their constituents and not the profits of the insurance industry.
Mr. Scontras attempts to persuade readers that a continuation of tax breaks for rich people will help bring down the deficits and debt. He really needs to elaborate on this because I can't see how it has helped anyone other then rich people since its inception 10 years ago. Those Bush tax cuts certainly didn't help me personally and I have not seen them create any new industries or jobs.
If people (voters) wish to ignore history then they will live with the consequences of their ignorance. If people (voters) allow pundits and politicians to think for them then they will live with the consequences of their laziness. If people really want to have intelligent governance by adults then they must learn to think critically and pay attention to their history for to do otherwise is to suffer the fate of the fools they have chosen to be.

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

Ah….the celebrated author of On MoonBeem Pond, sometimes called The Universal Notebook, enters the fray, outraged over the parking of the Scontras campaign truck. One wonders whether he has equal concerns about the parking of the Pingree-Sussman private chariot, and who is permitted to tread upon the red carpet it rates.

It’s always a treat to behold the searing intellectual rigor and logical purity of an art critic that MoonBeem brings to any debate. This time he is focused, floodlight like, on being “for” things, while his perceived Darth Vaders, the conservatives, are “against” things. He seems unable to grasp that in a coin flip, if you are “for“ heads, you are against “tails.”

So we wonder if Eddy and the Beemians are “for” granting special exemptions to the Teachers’ Unions regarding aspects of Obama-care they don't like, or “against” expecting said unions to live by the same laws and regulations as the rest of us will have to. Is Eddy “for” the government requiring us to purchase a product that they mandate, or “against” compliance with the Constitution? Are the Beemians “for” eradicating liberty and pursuit of happiness as embodied by capitalism, or “against” allowing humans to work hard and prosper for their labors?

Is Eddy “for” government sanctions on the manufacture of clam dip and Berkenstocks, or “against” the irrefutable benefits of free markets and entrepreneurism?

Come to think of it, does he hate capitalism enough to give up both, along with everything else it provides? Like payment to free lance writers? And newspapers, and clothes, and well....that's about it I guess.

(permalink)

eabeem says:

Melvin, Those are fool's choices, so I didn't bother making them. And I'm not sure where you got the idea that you, a pseudonymous commenter, get to dictate the rules of discourse. I tell people what I think under my own name every week. When you're willing to do so, let me know.

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

You know what you are Eddie? You're a real hoot, that's what you are.

Get a grip???? Looks to me like you're the one with the attention deficit problem. Float like a butterfly, present a moving target, change the subject, etc. Bob and weave, never answer. Never stay on point.

Now I dictate the rules? In what cloud of smoke did you find that one?

In case you didn't notice, 2 + 2 = 4, no matter what cognomen its posted under. And I bet you've looked at art and marveled at it, without knowing the name of the "artist."

Now...that "false choice" evasion. Wow, you're quite the incisive parser. Here's a clue - they weren't FALSE choices, they were both your choices because of the votes you cast two years ago. I didn't think that illuminating the issue of "for" and "against" would provide such a challenging read for you. But week by week, your inability to stay on point and grasp the meaning beyond your very own little "world" is becoming clearer and clearer.

When you're willing to make sense, and respond to points that challenge your thinking, be sure and let everyone in "the world around you" know.

For now, as they say in Yarmouth, get a dip, Eddie. Of the clam variety, if you can find any from some capitalist pig food processor.

(permalink)

eabeem says:

Have you noticed that the U.S. Constitution says nothing about free market capitalism or corporations? It does have a lot to say about government regulation of business though.

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

I'm flummoxed...your comment refers to the foregoing discussion just how???

And in case you didn't realize it, the Constitution describes the construction of our Federal Government and its limited powers.

Pointing out what it doesn't talk about is a non-sequitur. It doesn't say anything about strawberry ice cream, clam dip, or a bazillion other things, including free lance journalists, bird feeders, and Berkenstocks.

What it does do is enumerate specific and limited powers for the government. I refer you to the 10th amendment for everything else.

I suppose your response will be to describe the brand of peanut butter your great grandfather loved, and how he used it to convince his mules to push the dad-gummit horseless carriage out of the ditch. Either that, or how your UCC Congregation decided that the Government should regulate our relationship with aliens confused about their gender.

I hope you seek help for your affliction; modern pharmaceuticals are incredibly efficacious, so they say.

(permalink)

eabeem says:

You stated that liberty and the pursuit of happiness were embodied by capitalism. I was just pointing out that the Constitution, with its promise of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, has nothing to do with capitalism and that the corporations Republicans are so intent on protecting are not constitutional entities either. Pretty much on point as far as I can see, though I do confess that I can rarely follow the logic of your arguments, so I'm not surprised you can't follow mine. Basically, I find that your arguments are constructed on faulty premises, just like those of another Brunswick Tea Partier I know.

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

Boy, Eddie. You just keep digging that hole of yours deeper and deeper as the "world around you" consumes you.

Could you please point out to your readers where the Constitutional "promise of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" can be found? You clearly are a scholarly expert on such matters, and you have the bully pulpit.

Regarding your "logic," you seem to view that term as a squishy concept to be applied with the creative abandon of an artiste. As "far as you can see" doesn't seem to be very far at all. In fact, it doesn't look like you can see beyond your personal little j-axis.

You can't grasp that capitalism is the expression of individuals and groups of individuals applying their personal assets (financial and human capital) in the context of a free society (liberty) as they pursue their happiness in ways they choose, arranging for free exchanges in a marketplace occupied by others doing the same thing?

You really have a shallow and stilted grasp of how America and its economy functions, don't you. You are a sad, sad example of why we are on the road to ruin. And you purport to be a member of the illuminariat, speaking to us from your lofty position in thousands of copies of a weekly newspaper. Whose gonna pay for government benevolences when capitalism is gone, Eddie?

Another Brunswick Tea Partier you know? What are you trying to say, Eddie? Could you define Tea Party please? Could you define Tea Partier?

Your little barbs are a bit tiresome, especially when they stand in for a bit of rational thought. You're just like another Yarmouth Food Stamp Partier I don't know.

(permalink)

eabeem says:

I guess I had you confused with someone whose interests are "conservative studies & activities; dining; cooking; writing; raising hell & lowering taxes; reading; small batch bourbons; a well made icy cold dry martiniespecially with friends; good deli; good bakery; core founding principles; MHPC; head banging on hard walls." Sorry.

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

Ah....the mysterious "idiotic" phantom evaluator surfaces. With no evidence of Tea Party connection.

Said "idiotic" ratings left anonymously, even when the rater was invited to post why the rating was given, without sacrificing identity.

(permalink)

eabeem says:

Now I have no idea what you are talking about. That list came from the blog of someone I suspected of being Melvin Udall. If no, not.

(permalink)

eabeem says:

Oh, get a grip, Melvin. Yes, I find Chellie Pingree's private jet rides troubling. No, I am not a socialist. I'm just a suburban husband/father indulging my liberal tendencies while trying to make a living like everyone else.

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

Nice non-response to the "for" vs. "against" issue, Eddie.

Must be you're too conflicted to address the point; or maybe you're not. Flip a coin and make your decision that way.

(permalink)

tstmaine says:

Beem has spoken, Scontras is wrong. It must be a heavy burden that Mr. Beem carries being the arbiter of right and wrong, just like the self proclaimed "decider", George W Bush. Who would have thought that Bush and Beem had so much in common?

(permalink)

eabeem says:

Dean Scontras is wrong if he thinks Nancy Pelosi is responsible for the mounting national debt. She didn't start two wars and ruin the U.S. economy, the Republicans did. And Dean Scontras is wrong if he thinks attacking a California congresswoman is going to help him win an election in Maine. It's no burden at all to figure that out, but thanks for your concern.

(permalink)

tstmaine says:

Edgar Allen Beem gets it wrong on the Scontras debt truck. The Dean Scontras debt t6ruck did not "hog" the handicapped spaces at the Cumberland Fair. It was not parked in a space reserved for the handicapped. The truck was given the parking space by the proper people in charge of such things at the fair. A parking lot attendant asked on two occasions for the truck to be moved and both times the proper fair officials were consulted and said the truck was to remain where it was parked. As the person who parked the truck and dealt with the fair officials and the parking lot attendant, I have a healthy knowledge of the events.................those would be the facts Mr. Beem.

(permalink)

eabeem says:

I stand corrected then. I saw the unsightly vehicle parked inside the handicapped parking lot directly across from the entrance. I asked a fair employee about it and was told they had been trying to get it moved for several days. If a fair official actually decided that a political ad was properly placed in the handicapped parking area, I guess my beef would be with the Cumberland Farmers Association and not with Dean Scontras. Either way, it was wrong...as is Scontras.

(permalink)

tstmaine says:

Edgar Allen Beem gets it wrong on the Scontras debt truck. The Dean Scontras debt truck did not "hog" the handicapped spaces at the Cumberland Fair. The truck was not parked in a space reserved for the handicapped. The truck was given the parking space by the proper people in charge of such things at the fair. A parking lot attendant asked on two occasions for the truck to be moved and both times the proper fair officials were consulted and they said the truck was to remain where it was parked. As the person who parked the truck and dealt with the fair officials and the parking lot attendant, I have a healthy knowledge of the events.................those would be the facts Mr. Beem.

(permalink)

beachmom561 says:

Chellie Pingree is a hypocrite.
She rails against executives using private jets to fly and then uses Sussman's.
She got up on the House floor and ripped on Wall St. executives and AIG for taking bailouts and not giving up their jobs and/or salaries. Meanwhile, Sussman took bailout money for the hedge fund he manages.
She is out promoting and saying she thinks all campaigns should be publicly funded. That when special interests fun campaigns, the candidate then has their strings pulled by those special interests. Most of her campaign money comes from unions (special interest) and Sussman and friends. You know, Sussman who took bailout money and flies Chellie around in a private jet?
Pingree doesn't read the bills she is voting on.
She does Pelosi's bidding.
She is highly recommended by the Democratic Socialist Party of America.
I have had discussions with her staff and she thinks the Constitution is not something that needs to be followed if it doesn't support the Progressive causes.

Yes, it is time to get an adult in office. Someone who will base their votes on whether the bill is Constitutional or not. Someone who will put the country and Maine's people above a personal agenda.
Pingree had a hand in destroying Maine economically and helped to make it a moocher state.
Scontras has actually worked in the business world. He deals with real life budgets and issues that we all deal with. Not whether the pilot will be on time. Or whether the union bosses will fork over some more money.

So, the debt truck was parked in the wrong place.
That's what you get when you have everyday people who aren't political insiders helping out.
If that's the worst thing they do, big deal.
It's not as bad as ignoring the Constitution and living every day in a state of hypocrisy.

(permalink)

mconners12 says:

Similar logic would also dictate that firemen wipe their feet before entering a burnng building. Mr. Scontras uses plain common sense that resonates with thousands of worried Maine citizens who know that basic economic principles are not being followed in Washington and calamity may result. If we don't wake up and listen to him and leaders like him... Handicapped people will have a lot more to worry about than someone parking in their spot. The only thing I saw wrong with the debt bus was that it did not have a siren and blinking lights as well.

(permalink)

eabeem says:

Another way to look at it, of course, is that Scontras, like too many conservatives, isn't running FOR anything, he's just running AGAINST everythings and he doesn't care who gets hurt in the process. His me-first attitude was perfectly clear in his hogging handicapped spaces in order to attack Pelosi. The last people in the world you want running the government are people who are anti-government.

(permalink)

eabeem says:

Serious adults don't plaster pictures of Nancy Pelosi all over their truck, call it a debtmobile, and then park it all week in the handicapped parking lot at the Cumberland Fair. A fair official said they tried for days to get someone to move it.

(permalink)

tstmaine says:

Edgar Allen Beem gets it wrong on the Scontras debt truck. The Dean Scontras debt t6ruck did not "hog" the handicapped spaces at the Cumberland Fair. It was not parked in a space reserved for the handicapped. The truck was given the parking space by the proper people in charge of such things at the fair. A parking lot attendant asked on two occasions for the truck to be moved and both times the proper fair officials were consulted and said the truck was to remain where it was parked. As the person who parked the truck and dealt with the fair officials and the parking lot attendant, I have a healthy knowledge of the events.................those would be the facts Mr. Beem.

(permalink)

You must register or login to post a comment.
Copyright 2012 Sun Media Group