Advertisement
What People are Reading
Recent
Popular Alltime
Recent Comments
- It's hard to argue for the
5 hours 18 sec ago - Sorry, EA. I don't dispute
5 hours 29 min ago - Au contraire, my column keeps
7 hours 16 min ago - Mushroom Media is still
12 hours 18 min ago - The only distinctions I make
2 days 14 hours ago - Romney's wealth is an issue
2 days 14 hours ago - What!? We haven't quite
4 days 12 hours ago - Yes, from a Maryland
5 days 12 hours ago - Well said...and the Only
5 days 12 hours ago - The public needs to
5 days 13 hours ago
Advertisement
The Universal Notebook: Fighting off mural fatigue
As I write it is Day 42 of the Labor Mural Hostage Vigil.
Gov. Paul LePage still has the mural depicting Maine’s labor history hidden away in a closet at the Department of Labor. Yes, I am getting a little tired of the whole darn issue. And if I’m suffering mural fatigue, I’m sure you were sick of it days or weeks ago. So let me explain why it’s still important.
In a recent public opinion poll, 65.1 percent of respondents said they disapproved of LePage’s decision to remove the mural. Only 20.9 percent approved. The 9.7 percent who strongly approved represent the hardcore conservative base that is currently trying to dictate public policy to the rest of us in normally moderate Maine. So, yes, we have to care about a governor’s order to take down a mural he does not like because it smacks both of censorship and dictatorship.
Not only does the labor history mural represent the history of the exploitation of Maine workers, its forced removal now embodies the conservative Republican antipathy toward working people. These are the same people who, during the GOP state convention, removed pro-labor materials from a King Middle School classroom in Portland; the same people bent on blaming current economic woes not on the sins of Bush, but on working people, state employees, organized labor, teachers, and nurses – in short, anyone they might be able exploit were it not for the power of collective bargaining.
Don’t be fooled. Unless you’re a self-employed millionaire, this labor mural is your issue.
Some folks seem to think that in denying a request for a temporary restraining order to put the mural back, U.S. District Court Judge John Woodcock put an end to the matter. He did not. He simply allowed the mural to stay in storage while the lawsuit continues.
Woodcock did, however, accept the state’s argument that ordering the mural taken down was a legitimate exercise of “government speech” on the part of Gov. LePage. I respectfully disagree, both with the legal concept and with its application in this case. Suppression of free speech is only legitimate “government speech” in an Orwellian state.
Woodcock held that a reasonable person would conclude that the labor history mural was official government speech and not the free speech of the artist. But if that is so, a reasonable person would also have to conclude that the fall foliage mural in the lobby of the Margaret Chase Smith Federal Building, where Woodcock holds court, is also government speech. I believe a reasonable person would have no problem concluding that it is artist Yvonne Jacquette’s “speech,” not the government’s, despite the fact that the General Services Administration commissioned and paid for it.
Judy Taylor, the artist who painted the Maine labor history mural, is just less well known than Yvonne Jacquette, and, thus far, has stayed aloof from the fray, refusing to assert her own rights. It’s time she joined the fight. Because if government speech trumps individual free speech, we are all in trouble. You’d think Libertarians might be able to grasp that concept.
Beyond the court of public opinion, where LePage has already lost the mural case, and court of law, where he has won a temporary stay, the U.S. Department of Labor, which gave Maine most of the $60,000 used to commission the mural, has served notice that Maine must either put the mural back or pay it back. LePage has, thus far, simply ignored the feds.
A group of misguided Republicans in Aroostook County announced an effort to raise $60,000 to enable LePage to pay the feds back, but in the meantime, LePage’s then-commissioner of the Department of Economic and Community Development, Philip Congdon, went to the County, told them to “get off the reservation,” and, in what may be the only positive thing LePage has done so far, got fired.
If Paul LePage is as tired of the mural issue as some folks are, there is a very simple solution. He just needs to cite the U.S. Department of Labor demand, say he doesn’t like it, but he has no choice, and then order the mural put back so he can start trying to actually accomplish something.
I have tried to communicate this exit strategy to LePage and a member of his staff, but it’s hard to know what gets into the governor’s bunker these days.
Comments
TARP worked as it was designed to do. Get over it. I have. As far as public art goes, there is an orderly democratic process by which it is commissioned, not matter what any court says, it is wrong for a single elected official to substitute his judgment for that of more intelligent and more qualified individuals. As far as I am concerned, "government speech" is as bogus a concept as giving civil rights and free speech to corporations. Our forefathers had no intention of doing so. They just gave free speech to individuals. Anyone serious about defending freedom and democracy must stand against the Republicans hyppos of the far right. They will be the death of Ametrica.
Is it really the mural that fatigues us all? In the opening paragraph a poll was referenced, 65% disapproval of the handling of the mural. Were the pollsters asking the question for instance "If you were aware that Governor Baldacci raided the unemployment insurance fund to pay for the mural" would you still be in favor of having the mural at all? Straw man arguements of Bush's sins, Bush didn't have anything to do with the mural, Judge Woodcock's decision to have the mural safely stored while the legal case continues is wrong, claims of antipathy toward working people, a King Middle School that were labor materials were disturbed, a mural of gouged out eyes of then President Bush (an older poster), are not an arguement to make your point of raiding an unemployent fund for a mural that should have been paid for by collecting private donations, not the public purse. Use of public funds for unemployed people paid by employers to the fund should not be used for art.
As one might expect, Gov. LePage was wrong when he said unemployment insurance funds had been used to pay for the mural. Of the $60,000, $48,912 was federal money and $11,088 was state money. The state money came from the DOL's overhead account ($4,650) and the Bureau of Labor Standard's safety education and training account ($6,438). If you don't understand that the Bush adminsitration is responsible for the fininacial crisi we are in, I guess you're beyond hope.
http://www.maine.gov/tools/whatsnew/index.php?topic=Gov+News&id=225630&v.... I defer to those who have researched this subject regarding the misuse of Unemployment Funds and the request to the Read Act for infrastructure costs. At the bottom of the article, it clearly states, that the bill does not explicity say that any money is going towards art. Employers who pay into the Unemployment fund were not consulted where this money would be spent. They would not have agreed to it being spent as it is their money for employees benefits, or infrastructure, not for a mural. So the Point of the poll is empathy, not factual. If citizens knew that unemployment funds were being used, in lieu of private donations for the mural, the poll would have been very different as it is coming out of their pockets, when they are unemployed and cannot pay for their groceries, nor eat the mural.
Bush had a hand in the financial crisis.
TARP (Banks toxic assests) and STIMULUS being used for Make Work Jobs and QE1 and QE2 the printing of funny money by Mr. Bernake, belongs to the new regime, which now will be borne by our children and grandchildren.
There was no misuse of funds. Since when do people, whether employers or private citizens, get a say in how their taxes are spent? No one went without unemployment compensation because the USDOL helped fund the mural. That money was earmarked for infrastructure. Unless you thuink it is never appropriate to spend tax dollars on public art, everything about the commissioning the Maine Labor History Mural was open and aboveboard, as opposed to the way Gov. LePage removed it. And TARP worked. Get over it. Obama is doing a good job. LePage isn't.
From the Washington Post, "TARP, reviled by populists of the left and right, produced more benefit for the U.S. economy at lower cost to taxpayers than even its strongest initial supporters expected." I could go on all day. TARP was a success. I don;t like it and you don't like it, but the truth hurts.
I'm afraid you don't know what you are talking about. TARP is widely viewed as a success, except by blind partisans of the far right. As Robert Samuelson wrote, "It isn’t often that the government launches a major program that achieves its main goals at a tiny fraction of its estimated costs. That’s the story of TARP — the Troubled Assets Relief Program. Created in October 2008 at the height of the financial crisis, it helped stabilize the economy, using only $410 billion of its authorized $700 billion. And most of that will be repaid. The Congressional Budget Office, which once projected TARP’s ultimate cost at $356 billion, now says $19 billion. This could go lower."
Edgar, just find an old fax machine and fax the governor a letter from "a secret admirer." That's all it took to get the mural removed, so it should work just fine in getting it replaced.


What art is displayed in a government building is as much government speech and what art is displayed in your home is personal speech. If you want to attack the "other side" then use logical arguments.
and, by the way, although Bush signed some of the laws that created the financial mess we are in now, it was Frank and Dodd that authored the bills and the Democratic congress that pushed the bills to law. The idea that home ownership is a right is downright idiocy.