Thu, Feb 09, 2012

Advertisement

Advertisement

The Universal Notebook: Arizona on my mind

My brother-in-law Warren was here from Tucson last week for his annual homecoming visit. In one of the rare moments when he wasn’t eating Italian sandwiches (which you can’t get in Arizona) or body surfing (which you can’t do in Arizona) at Scarborough Beach, I asked him to explain Arizona’s Senate Bill 1070, the hugely controversial anti-immigration law.

Warren is not a political animal, nor is he as liberal as I am, but his Arizona resident’s perspective on SB 1070 confirmed my own remote view of it – it’s just another bogus conservative initiative designed to rile up base Republicans.

SB 1070, Warren told me, is a convenient diversion from the fact that the economy and the education system in Arizona are in a mess. The state Legislature can’t do anything about real problems, so it manufactures phony ones.

Illegal immigrants are not a major problem in Arizona. Supporters of SB 1070 would have us believe that the state is overrun by illegals, beset by a crime wave, and the federal government won’t do anything about it. In fact, illegal border crossings are declining rapidly (right along with the U.S. economy), the violent crime rate in Arizona is the lowest it’s been since 1971 and the property crime rate is the lowest it’s been since 1966.

Fortunately, SB 1070 arrived on the national stage already identified as a terrible idea. The federal government filed suit and a federal judge issued an injunction against its most draconian provisions. To begin with, SB 1070 would essentially mandate racial profiling, directing law enforcement officers to check the immigration status of anyone stopped for any sort of infraction if they suspected they might be illegals.

Conservatives, who love to crow about the erosion of individual liberties, don’t seem to mind the idea of a police state as long as it doesn’t apply to them. But, of course, it would. How are you going to tell the legal from the illegal immigrants, the residents from the non-residents, the U.S. citizens from the foreign nationals unless you check everyone’s papers? Hey, and why stop in Arizona? Maine has an international border. How would you feel if Maine state police asked everyone with a Franco-American accent or surname to prove they are American citizens? Talk that over at your next tea party.

Just to confirm Warren’s assertion that illegal immigrants were not a problem in Arizona (they work hard at jobs American’s don’t want, keep their heads down, and don’t commit crimes), I checked in with my old friend Randy, who edits a newspaper in Flagstaff. Randy told me that the Flagstaff City Council has unanimously opposed SB 1070 as an unfounded state mandate. Newspapers in Flagstaff, Tucson and Phoenix have all editorialized against the measure. Even law enforcement officials are opposed to it, arguing that it would distract them from real issues and make it harder to get cooperation from the Hispanic community.

What all the wild complaints about the estimate 12 million illegal immigrants in the U.S. (500,000 in Arizona) usually fail to note is that the vast majority of those people entered the U.S. legally. What’s needed is comprehensive immigration reform, amnesty, and a path to citizenship for all those illegal immigrants who are necessary for the U.S. labor market. Even Arizona Sen. John McCain used to understand and support that, but now that there’s GOP political hay to be made bashing immigrants, he’s bashing away with the best (or worst) of them.

The worst, of course, is Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer. She was lukewarm on SB 1070 until she discovered it was an issue she could ride to re-election. Then she became Miss Anti-Immigrant 2010. But it looks now as though Brewer’s SB 1070 crusade may backfire. Turns out SB 1070 will greatly benefit the Corrections Corp. of America (CCA), the company that runs private prisons in Arizona. And, oh by the way, two of Brewer’s top advisers worked for CCA; one a lobbyist, the other a publicist.

Why didn’t I think of that? It’s all about the money, as it usually is with conservatives. Pretend to be populist while you do the bidding of Corporate America. SB 1070 is not about illegal immigration or crime; it’s about filling privatized prison cells.

By the way, next time you see Gov. Brewer on television, see if she reminds you of anyone. To me, beneath that frosted bouffant, she’s a dead ringer for the Wicked Witch of the West.

Oh what a world! What a world!

Comments

JEsse says:

Many happen to be concerned about The Grand Canyon State. They are actually debating in the state. There continues to be no ruling on the SB1070 The Grand Canyon State law, allowing officers to check immigration status of many that the Obama administration is challenging because of constitutional grounds of the law Governor Jan Brewer decried. The Department of Justice decided to such Joe Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa County. This just heats up the battle between Arizona and the government. The Justice Department says that Sheriff Joe Arpaio has not cooperated with an investigation of civil rights abuses.

(permalink)

eabeem says:

The majority of the estimated 12 million "illegal" immigrants in the U.S. entered legally. They just never left, settling in, outstaying their visas, etc. So it's not like the border is a sieve. We just need a reasonable way of providing a path to citizenship, which once might have been possible, but now that unreason seems to be getting the upper hand in this country, it's probably not.

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

So you've got some facts that document that they "entered legally," but are overstaying their welcome?

More and more I see that you wiggle and wobble around things, finding a way to equivocate.

(permalink)

Melvin Udall says:

Hey, Eddie, how about clearing up a few things.

What does "essentially mandate" mean? Is that like being "essentially pregnant," as opposed to pregnant?

"Newspapers have editorialized against it;" is that supposed to carry some special weight?

"Even law enforcement officials are opposed to it;" would that be a majority of them, say 40% or so, or a few, or ten, or what?

Put another way, could I say that Newspapers have editorialized in support of it, and law enforcement officials support it as well? You know, just picking the cherries from the tumbleweeds, so to speak, without giving any numbers, or other confirmable stats.

Then I love your claim that "the vast majority" of the illegal immigrants in the US entered it legally. I hate to pick at nits, especially from an established commentator like yourself, but if they entered legally, wouldn't that make them "legal" immigrants?

I know, such details are left for the interested student. Your job as a reliable source of suggestion is to remain objectively distant from things that would complicate your point of view.

And to return the favor, you can have "the last word."

(permalink)

You must register or login to post a comment.
Copyright 2012 Sun Media Group