What People are Reading
Recent
Popular Alltime
Recent Comments
- While it is true that I don't
44 min 46 sec ago - The fact that so many people
3 hours 24 min ago - Faithful may very well be
20 hours 8 min ago - Salary "cut?"
Let's use plain
1 day 15 hours ago - Wow ! Have you been to Sunday
1 day 18 hours ago - This is classic.
Augur, a
3 days 1 hour ago - This is known that cash makes
3 days 18 hours ago - One could question the wisdom
4 days 2 hours ago - A lot of smoke and mirrors
4 days 2 hours ago - The primary reason for the
24 weeks 1 day ago
More in Opinion
The Universal Notebook: It's time for a Maine Woods National Park
Daughter Nora tells people she lives in Narnia, C.S. Lewis’s fantasy-land where the White Witch decreed that it always be winter, though never Christmas.
Actually, she lives in the White Mountains, where she and her fiance work for conservation groups.
Our whole family was up in the Whites last month for a nephew’s wedding at the Omni Mt. Washington Resort. The great hotel sits in the bowl of Mt. Washington Valley like the palace of some hibernal queen surrounded by pristine, snow-covered mountains and woodlands. A winter wonderland. Narnia, indeed.
Mt. Washington Valley remains relatively unspoiled thanks to the Weeks Act, which President William H. Taft signed into law on March 1, 1911. The Weeks Act authorized the federal government to purchase lands in the east to establish national forests.
A century later, we could use another Weeks Act. The more wild land we protect today, the better the future will be – for us, for posterity, for all living things. That’s why I support the creation of a Maine Woods National Park.
I know, I know – it’s not a popular idea here in Vacationland, at least not yet. But I don’t know anyone who thinks the creation of Baxter State Park or Acadia National Park was not a good idea. And as the subtitle to Ken Burns’s documentary puts it, the National Park System is “America’s Best Idea.”
That subtitle comes from writer Wallace Stegner’s observation that the national parks were “the best idea we ever had. Absolutely American, absolutely democratic, they reflect us at our best rather than our worst.”
Ironic, but true. America, a nation founded on exploration, expansion and exploitation, manifests its highest and best self when it conserves and preserves. These days, of course, any initiative that appears to sacrifice personal gain in favor the greater good tends to get labelled socialism, but then the difference between good and evil is often just the difference between short-term and long-term consequences.
I admire Roxanne Quimby for investing so much of her Burt’s Bees fortune to acquire woodlands in Maine’s unorganized territories in hopes of someday having them added to Baxter State Park to help create a Maine Woods National Park. Sure, she gets criticized for her conservation efforts, but then so did Percy Baxter in his day. It’s human nature to be short-sighted. Take the long view.
When I drive through North Conway on my way to see Nora, I see the future of Millinocket, a commercial center clustered at the gateway to a great expanse of preserved wildlands. The argument I most often hear against a Maine Woods National Park is that the state will lose control of its lands, but then I doubt the federal government could have done much worse than the state of Maine in handling the Plum Creek mega-development around Moosehead Lake. That’s what I mean by the difference between good and evil being the difference between short-term and long-term consequences.
Maine has done a good job with patchwork preservation. Now it’s time for wholesale conservation, time to stitch the crazy quilt of protected lands together. The future of the North Maine Woods does not lie in wood chips and toiler paper; it lies in keeping the largest expanse of unbroken woodlands east of the Mississippi intact. One hundred years from now, our descendants will look back and thank us.
(A footnote: For a good history of conservation efforts in New England, I recommend "Twentieth-Century New England Land Conservation," edited by Charles H.W. Foster, Harvard University Press, 2009. It’s a state-by-state narrative, the Maine chapter written by Thomas Urquhart, former director of Maine Audubon Society.)
Comments
Actualy, I do my part for the environment by staying out of it as much as possible. Interesting that you should bring up the future however. The biggest difference between liberals and conservatives is that liberals take the long view. Conservatives can't see much beyond the next election. That's why we never make any progress when conservatives are in control. You're (facetiously) correct though -- massive development would kill Maine ... in the long run.
Ed,
Glad you're agitating for a North Woods National Park. My wife and our two kids looped the national parks of the Southwest in the summer of 2008, and it was the best trip of my life. The parks, their rangers, the facilities and the freedom to explore turned us into addicts. Next summer, with frequent flier miles, we're flying to the Pacific Northwest to camp our way through the parks from Washington to California. We camped in Acadia twice last summer and sat through a ranger program about 'National Parks in the Sky' that my kids will never forget. The prospect of a North Woods National Park is the most exciting thing happening in the State of Maine today.
Jim Sullivan

Anything to stop the massive development and economic explosion that is killing Maine. If we don't stop it now, someone might want to move here, or even worse, stay here.
Don't worry about Edgar though, he'll be in his CAVE, eating BANANAs, and playing with his little NIMBY.
Now we know: anything "for the future" is really for him.