Advertisement
What People are Reading
Recent
Popular Alltime
Recent Comments
- It's hard to argue for the
4 hours 55 min ago - Sorry, EA. I don't dispute
5 hours 24 min ago - Au contraire, my column keeps
7 hours 11 min ago - Mushroom Media is still
12 hours 14 min ago - The only distinctions I make
2 days 14 hours ago - Romney's wealth is an issue
2 days 14 hours ago - What!? We haven't quite
4 days 12 hours ago - Yes, from a Maryland
5 days 12 hours ago - Well said...and the Only
5 days 12 hours ago - The public needs to
5 days 12 hours ago
Advertisement
UPDATE: Maintenance facility delay means fewer Amtrak Downeaster trips between Portland and Brunswick
BRUNSWICK — Amtrak Downeaster passenger rail service hasn't started north of Portland, but the number of daily round trips to Brunswick has already been reduced.
The change was good news to some Brunswick residents. But the resulting train schedule could be bad news for businesses in Brunswick and Freeport that expected the Downeaster to deliver day-trippers and shoppers with money to spend.
Patricia Quinn, executive director of the Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority, said Nov. 4 that when the expanded service begins next fall, the Downeaster will only make two daily trips to Freeport and Brunswick. The train was expected to make at least three and eventually four or five a day.
The decrease is due to a delay in construction of a train maintenance facility in Brunswick.
The building would house the trains overnight for routine maintenance and cleaning. That would allow the Downeaster to end all of its runs in Brunswick, not in Portland, and increase the number of daily runs between the two stops.
Without the Brunswick facility, the train will have to travel between Brunswick and Portland twice a day without passengers.
In response to some Brunswick residents' concerns about environmental and health impacts, NNERPA increased the size of the building from 40,000 square feet to 60,000 square feet – large enough to house all three train sets indoors.
But in a Nov. 3 letter to Brunswick Town Manager Gary Brown, Quinn said increasing the building's size to mitigate the impact of noise and vibration on nearby homes would push the project over budget.
She later said initial estimates put the cost of the expanded building at around $7.5 million. NNERPA had only budgeted about $5 million for the project.
Quinn said NNEPRA is hoping to secure the additional funding from the federal Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery, or TIGER, program. The bulk of the cost will still be funded by state bonds.
The reduction in daily round trips isn't as problematic to Sandy Updegraph, executive director of the Freeport Economic Development Corp., as the timing of the trains that do run.
According to Quinn, a preliminary schedule has northbound trains passing through Freeport just before 12:30 p.m. and 10 p.m. Trains heading south from Brunswick will stop in Freeport just after 7 a.m. and 1:30 p.m.
This schedule would not allow a visitor from Boston to spend the day shopping in Freeport, Updegraph noted.
"The impact of having fewer, rather than more, round trips is certainly obvious in that there would be fewer people passing through, but the bigger impact is if NNERPA is able to get a (layover) facility in Brunswick ... those additional trips would be later in the day, and so we could have people ... come from the Boston area and spend the entire day in Freeport and go back that same day," Updegraph said.
Wayne Davis, chairman of the rail-advocacy group TrainRiders/Northeast, called the prospect of beginning service to Brunswick with only two trips a day "frightening."
"The frequency of service is one of the big selling points on any train service," he said. "It's very difficult to make two trips a day fit very many people's personal schedules."
Davis expressed concern that potential Downeaster passengers could be turned off by the infrequent schedule, and suggested the service could have started with four or even five daily trips to Boston.
He also expressed concern about the impact of decreased service on the Brunswick business community, especially new businesses at Brunswick Station that may have been expecting more than two daily round trips.
"Everybody is looking to traffic that would be generated by the five round trips," he said. "It's a great disappointment for us after all these years."
Michael Lyne, on-site project manager for JHR Development, which built Brunswick Station and the Inn at Brunswick Station, said the company was never promised a set number of daily train runs. But he guessed that "all of the small businesses up and down Maine Street are looking forward to more bites of the apple vs. fewer. Any Amtrak train rolling into town is better than none, but if we can create more volume for small businesses here without adding cars, that should be the goal."
But for many of the residents of the Bouchard Drive neighborhood in Brunswick, which borders the site of the future train maintenance facility, the delay in constructing the building was welcome news.
"We think it's encouraging that they're waiting," said Anna Nelson, a Bouchard Drive resident and neighborhood representative to NNEPRA's advisory group on the maintenance facility.
Nelson said she hopes the delay will prompt NNEPRA to consider putting the facility on land owned by local contractor Ted Crooker in East Brunswick, a site that many Bouchard Drive neighbors preferred, but NNERPA maintained was impractical.
"I think there's still hope that they could choose the better site of the two," she said.
But Quinn said that in spite of the delay, the chosen site, between Church Road and Stanwood Street, is the only one under consideration.
"The Crooker site is not an option," she said in an email.
Quinn said the NNEPRA board is committed to finding the funding to make the project happen.
"Every passing day we realize the importance of the facility being there," she said. "The longer the facility is not in Brunswick will only constrain the service for the entire corridor."
Emily Guerin can be reached at 781-3661 ext.123 or eguerin@theforecaster.net. Follow her on Twitter: @guerinemily.
Comments
I guess I'm confused. The consultants said Brunswick West was the best location because it would be cheapest to build there. However, now they're saying it will cost the most to build in Brunswick West. If NNEPRA was concerned about our tax dollars wouldn't they build where it costs less, doesn't impact several hundred taxpayers and helps the base redevelop? This seems to be a case of this is where we want the layover facility and we don't care about the cost or whether it makes any sense. If so why did they waste $60,000 of taxpaper money on a study that is now shown to be faulty.
Second I read where it takes the train 30 minutes to go back to Portland from Brunswick abd yet they said it would take 45 minutes to go from Cook's Corner to downtown Brunswick! Doesn't make any sense to me.
Amazing how the board of NNEPRA keeps changing their story and certain Brunswick councilors and the town manager just sit their and support it even while their own tax paying citizens are getting a raw deal. That, Mr. Reynolds, is shameful!
Thank you, Mainenative!
Yes, NNEPRA promised Brunswick the world (the figure is now up to 7 trains per day) before securing funds, before completing a rigorous site selection analysis, and before even approaching the hundred families they would impact. Some in the town, though, accepts whatever NNEPRA says at face value. So now the neighbors are somehow at fault for simply wanting NNEPRA to mitigate the effects of a 60,000 square foot industrial facility among their homes. It doesn't make sense.
The so-called "Cook's Corner" site mentioned by equiano64 is dead. It can't function as intended and no amount of mitigation will solve that. The same is true for the Industrial Park site. The only site that works, and this is by a great margin, is the Brunswick West site. Anyone who argues otherwise lives in the realm of delusion, pure and simple.
What we have here is the unfolding of a tragedy. The cost has risen because of delays and demands instigated by a small but determined group whose interests fall far, far from those of Brunswick as a whole, let alone the mid-coast region.
While Brunswick reels, "one hundred families and . . . taxpayers" celebrate. Shameful!
Jeff Reynolds: in what sense has the cost "risen"? Should NNEPRA have started by budgeting for no mitigation at all? Whatever costs NNEPRA added did not come from the neighborhood, because NNEPRA never asked the neighborhood what it wanted.
Not living in Brunswick I do not care where the facility goes. That said I do not understand why the trainsets; locomotive and passenger cars have to be stored inside - what a waste of millions of dollars ! Instead add another passing track or how about a double mainline Boston to Portland- Freeport, that in my opinion would make more sense.
I'm glad NNEPRA is pausing a bit. I hope the town takes this opportunity to carefully consider what is best for all here. The Brunswick West site is proving to be more expensive than NNEPRA hoped. As predicted, there are serious costs associated with making the site work (from coal-ash contamination to sandy soil conditions), even without factoring in the need to mitigate noise and vibration impacts to the hundred or so homes adjacent to the site.
I hope the town now realizes that it's best to take a step back from this process and think about what is in the best interests of all. Brunswick West serves only NNEPRA, and at the expense of one hundred families and Brunswick taxpayers. The Cook's Corner site, Brunswick East, can serve the needs of both Amtrak *and* the town. That site is ideally suited to leverage the Amtrak facility into a transportation hub that includes passengers, freight, and tourists. (Brunswick West is too narrow for that.)
We have an opportunity to get development right in Brunswick. Let's take the time it takes.

Tragedy? The only tragedy is the loss of quality of life for Brunswick West families. Coal ash, fumes, noise 24 hours a day just so business owners can make a few more bucks.
No matter where this depot is built it will be noisy and nasty. Don't forget, there are people living in East Brunswick that might just have something to say, too.
Keep the noise and contamination where it is in Portland.