What People are Reading
Recent
Popular Alltime
Recent Comments
- "somebody needs to give a
23 hours 28 min ago - While it is true that I don't
2 days 3 hours ago - The fact that so many people
2 days 6 hours ago - Faithful may very well be
2 days 23 hours ago - Salary "cut?"
Let's use plain
3 days 18 hours ago - Wow ! Have you been to Sunday
3 days 21 hours ago - This is classic.
Augur, a
5 days 4 hours ago - One could question the wisdom
6 days 5 hours ago - A lot of smoke and mirrors
6 days 5 hours ago
More in Opinion
Letter: Falmouth squeezes property owners
My wife and I have been concerned for some time over the perceived encroachment of the Falmouth conservationists on the private land owners of this town.
This concern was increased when we tuned in to a rebroadcast of the Jan. 25 Town Council meeting and heard a young man presenting a proposal to increase the restrictions around certain vernal pools. He was very clear in stating that the new laws were to exceed those mandated by the state, because it was felt that the latter were not “scientific” enough.
We have lived in our home for 52-plus years and have acquired 15 acres of land that are blessed with both frontage on the Presumpscot River and a vernal pool. Both of these former assets are becoming curses due to Falmouth's setback regulations (also in excess of the state) and the increasing prohibitions around vernal pools. We have paid our taxes on our land all of these years with the goal of leaving value to our children when we are gone. The way things are heading, that privilege will be denied.
There appeared to be considerable opposition from the public to these restrictions and, despite harassment from the chairwoman, Fred Chase gave a pertinent example of how private acreage can be totally devalued by the many obstacles that have been put in place by the town.
It begins to look as though our best bet is a clear-cut.
Philip M. Baker
Falmouth
